期刊文献+

面阵列封装互连结构热循环翘曲变形抗力

Resistance to warpage deformation of area array packaging interconnect under thermal cyclic load
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借助有限元软件对钎料球、钎料柱和铜柱阵列互连结构热循环载荷下的翘曲变形行为进行研究.结果表明,三者升温过程均表现为刚度低的树脂基板呈下凹变形、而降温至0℃后呈现上凸变形,变形规律相同.不同温度下两端基板的热膨胀系数差异引发的基板内及相连焊球/焊柱内的应力及力矩是翘曲变形发生的驱动力.两焊柱阵列互连的基板翘曲位移接近,但均明显低于焊球阵列的基板,翘曲变形抗力更大.–40~125℃热循环温度范围及基板尺寸条件下,铜柱未屈服,相对钎料柱阵列互连,未表现铜柱可挠曲变形释放应力的优势. The warpage behaviors of solder ball array interconnect, solder column array interconnect and copper column array interconnect structures under thermal cycling load were studied by finite element software. The results show that the warpage deformations of three kinds of area array interconnects is the same, the resin substrates with low stiffness exhibit a concave deformations during the heating stage above room temperature, while the convex deformation occurs after cooling to 0 °C. The stress and torque in the substrates and the ball/column array interconnects caused by the difference of thermal expansion coefficients of both ends substrates at different temperatures are the driving forces of warping. The resin substrates of the solder/copper column array interconnect have similar warpage displacements, but both of them are obviously lower than the substrates of solder ball array interconnect, and the warpage deformation resistance is higher. Under the thermal cycling temperature range from –40 °C to 125 °C and given substrate size condition, the yielding deformation of the copper column has not occurred. Comparison with the solder column array interconnect, the advantage of releasing stress by flexural deformation of the copper column is not exhibit.
出处 《焊接学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期99-102,共4页 Transactions of The China Welding Institution
关键词 面阵列封装 翘曲变形 焊球阵列互连 钎料柱阵列互连 铜柱阵列互连 area array packages warpage deformation solder ball array interconnect solder column array interconnect copper column array interconnect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1李晓延,严永长.电子封装焊点可靠性及寿命预测方法[J].机械强度,2005,27(4):470-479. 被引量:43
  • 2薛松柏,胡永芳,禹胜林.BGA封装器件焊点抗剪强度的试验[J].焊接学报,2005,26(10):62-64. 被引量:5
  • 3Perkins A, Sitaraman S K. Thenno-mechanical failure comparison and evaluation of CCGA and CBGA electronic packages[ C]// Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2003:422 - 430.
  • 4Park S B, Joshi Rahul, Goldmann Lewis. Reliability of lead-free copper columns in comparison with tin-lead solder column interconnects[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2008, 48(5) : 763 - 772.
  • 5Bor Z H, Sudipta K R. Ceramic column grid array technlology with coated solder columns[ C]// Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Hopewell Juncytion, New York, 2000: 1347- 1353.
  • 6Lau J, Dauksher W. Reliability of an 1657CCGA (ceramic column grid array) package with 95.5Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu lead-free solder paste on PCBs (printed circuit boards)[J]. Journal of Electronic Packaging, 2005, 127 (2): 96-105.
  • 7Che F X, Pang H J L. Thermal fatigue reliability analysis for PBGA with Sn3.8 AgO. 7 Cu solder joints [ C ]// Electronics Packaging Tech - nology Conference, Singapore, 2004: 787-792.
  • 8Shi X Q, Pang H L J, Zhou W, et al. Low cycle fatigue analysis of temperature and frequency effects in eutectic solder alloy [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2000, 22(3) : 217 - 228.
  • 9Ghaffarian R. Thermal cycle reliability and failure mechanisms of CCGA and PBGA assemblies with and without comer staking[J]. Components and Packaging Technologies, 2008, 31(2): 285-296.
  • 10S.B. Park,Rahul Joshi.Comparison of thermo-mechanical behavior of lead-free copper and tin–lead column grid array packages[J]. Microelectronics Reliability . 2008 (5)

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部