科学的两种理解路径及其隐忧

Two Ways of Understanding Science and Their Hidden Problems

理性作为一种开放、敞开与他在的理解和追求,在表象世界的可理解性空间中进行布展。构造性理解与经验性理解作为科学的两种运思路径是理性在表象世界中布展的具体呈现。构造性理解与相似性思维具有相通性,在对自然世界与生活世界的理解中能够呈现出更为丰富和深刻的内容,经验性理解与分析性思维具有同构性,对自然世界与生活世界的理解呈现出机械和封闭的特征。科学实证主义作为经验性理解的典范性代表,囿于其内在的局限性,对科学自身以及人类社会的秩序建构都带来了隐忧。

Rationality, as an understanding and pursuit of opening and pointing to others, is deployed in the intelligibility space of the presentational world. Constructive understanding and empirical understanding, two scientific thinking paths, are the concrete representation of rational exhibition in the presentational world. Constructive understanding and similarity thinking are interlinked, and they can present richer and more profound contents in the understanding of the natural world and the living world. Empirical understanding and analytical thinking are isomorphic, their understanding of the natural world and the living world presents mechanical and closure characteristics. Scientific empiricism, as an exemplary representative of empirical understanding, is constrained by its inherent limitations, brings hidden problems to the construction of science itself and the order of human society.