期刊文献+

走向有效的公众参与科学——论科学传播“民主模型”的困境与知识分工的解决方案 被引量:16

Toward effective public engagement with science a dilemma of democracy model in science communication and its solution from the division of epistemic labor
原文传递
导出
摘要 科学传播中公众参与科学的民主模型是通过政治想象翻译成协商民主来实现的。过去20年中,虽然公众参与科学无论在理论还是实践上都取得了巨大成就,但也面临着与公共政策中决策科学化与民主化相同的两难困境,使公众参与科学流于表面。这一困境产生的原因在于缺乏自我反省的体制化科学异化公众,进而导致在协商过程中科学家与公众政治地位不平等。实际上,科学家与公众拥有不同类型的知识,关注科学风险的不同维度。通过知识的劳动分工,公众负责决定目标,科学家负责实现目标,可以走向真正有效的公众参与科学。 The democracy model of public engagement with science in science communication is realized through being translated into deliberative democracy.Public engagement with science has great achievements both of theories and practice.However,as in public policy,it also faces the dilemma of scientization and democratization of decision.The dilemma makes the public participate in science superficially.The root of the dilemma lies in the alienation of the public by institutional science which lacks of self-reflection.The alienation leads to the inequality of the public and scientists in the processes of deliberation.Actually,the publics and scientists have different types of knowledge and concern different dimensions of scientific risks.Through the division of epistemic labor that the public is responsible for the selection of objectives and scientists are responsible for the realization of the objectives,effective public engagement with science shall emerge.
作者 孙秋芬 周理乾 SUN Qiu-fen;ZHOU Li-qian(School of Law,Nanjing Teeh University,Nanjing 211816,China;Department of Philosophy,NanJing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期1921-1927,2010,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 中国博士后基金项目(2017M611789)
关键词 科学传播 公众参与科学 民主模型 知识的劳动分工 目的-手段 science communication public engagement with science democracy model division of epistemic labor end- means
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献78

  • 1任一奇,王雅蕾,王国华,冯伟.微博谣言的演化机理研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(5):50-54. 被引量:40
  • 2英国皇家学会.公众理解科学[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2004.7.
  • 3Royal Society.The Public Understanding of Science[R].London:Royal Society,1985.公众理解科学(中译本)[M].唐英英,译.北京:北京理工大学出版社,2004.
  • 4Nelkin D.Science Controversies:The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the United States[C]//Jasanoff S,Markle G E,Petersen J C,Pinch T.(eds),Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.First Edition,Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,1995:444-456.
  • 5Lewenstein B V.The Meaning of'Public Understanding of Science'in the United States After World War II[J].Public Understanding of Science,1992,1(1):45-68.
  • 6Wynne B.Further disorientation in the hall of mirrors[J].Public Understanding of Science,2014,23(1):60-70.
  • 7House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology.Third Report:Science and Society[R/OL].Chapter 5:Engaging the Public.London,2000.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm.
  • 8Fisher E.Editorial Overview:Public Science and Technology Scholars:Engaging Whom?[J].Science&Engineering Ethics,2011,17(4):607-620.
  • 9Jasanoff S.Constitutional moments in governing science and technology[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,2011,17(4):621-638.
  • 10Horst M.On the weakness of strong ties[J].Public Understanding of Science,2014,23(1):43-47.

共引文献102

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部