期刊文献+

中文版重症监护室尊重量表的信效度研究 被引量:3

Study on reliability and validity of Chinese version of Respect Scale in Intensive Care Unit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]翻译重症监护室尊重量表(ICU-RESPECT),并对其进行信效度研究。[方法]翻译并修订ICU-RESPECT,用中文版ICU-RESPECT对125例监护室病人进行调查,对结果进行信度和效度分析。[结果]中文版ICU-RESPECT的重测信度为0.876,总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.832,各条目和总量表得分的Pearson相关性分析检测结果显示,相关系数(r)在0.482~0.693,均有统计学意义(P<0.01);量表的内容效度为0.95。探索性因子分析提取1个因子,累计方差贡献率为52.373%,条目的负荷范围为0.583~0.792,效标关联效度为0.912(P<0.01)。[结论]中文版ICU-RESPECT的信效度较好,可用于评估重症监护室医护人员对病人的尊重情况。 Objective:To translate the Intensive Care Unit Respect Scale(ICU -RESPECT) and study its reliability and validity. Meth- ods:ICU- RESPECT was translated and revised, and 125 patients in the intensive care unit were investigated with the Chinese version of ICU - RESPECT. The results were analyzed for reliability and validity. Results:The test -retest reliability of the Chinese version of ICU - RESPECT was 0. 876,and the Cronbach's α of the total scale was 0. 832. The Pearson correlation analysis of each item and the total score showed that the correlation coefficient r was 0. 482-0. 693. Statistically significant(P〈0.01) ;the content validity of the scale was 0.95. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 1 factor, the cumulative variance contribution rate was 52. 373 %, the load range of the entry was 0. 583-0. 792 ,and the criterion validity was 0. 91E(P〈0. 01). Conclusions:The Chinese version of ICU- RESPECT had good reliability and validity,and could be used to evaluate the respect of patients in intensive care unit.
作者 郑洁 Zheng Jie(The Third People's Hospital of Wuxi,Jiangsu 214041 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2018年第23期3741-3743,共3页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 重症监护室 尊重 重症监护室尊重量表 信度 效度 ICU respect ICU - RESPECT reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献112

  • 1肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4192
  • 2张俊娥,郑美春,苏小茵,李津,叶新梅.社会支持对结肠造口患者自尊变化的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(7):489-492. 被引量:54
  • 3万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1328
  • 4韩跃红,孙书行.人的尊严和生命的尊严释义[J].哲学研究,2006(3):63-67. 被引量:69
  • 5Ruth Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept[J]. BMJ, 2003,327 : 1 190-1 420.
  • 6The President' s Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioeth ics:Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics [C]. Washington, D. C. : President' s Council on Bioethics, 2008.
  • 7President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medi cine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forgo Life-sustaining Treatment [M]. Washington, DC: US Govern ment Printing Office, 1983:24.
  • 8President's Council on Bioethics. Human Cloning and Human Dignity[C]. Washington, DC: President’ s Council on Bioethics, Hu man Cloning and Human Dignity, 2002.
  • 9Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetics and human behavior[R/ OL].(2006-09-07) [2008-09-02]. http://www, nuffieldbioethics, org/go/ourwork/behaviouralgenetics/publication _ 311. ht ml.
  • 10Stanley M. Gianner. Dignity is a Moral Imperative[J/OL]. (2003-12-25)[2008-09 -02]. http://www, bmj. com/cgi/eletters/327/ 7429/1419 # 44696.

共引文献470

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部