期刊文献+

多学科期刊群在线开放评议出版模式的构建 被引量:5

Establishment of publishing mode of open review in multi-disciplinary journal group
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】构建多学科期刊群在线开放评议出版模式,为国内学术期刊界提供借鉴。【方法】分析现行科学评审出版系统存在延迟出版、不透明、客观性受到怀疑等方面的弊端,提出扩展多学科预印本仓储的功能,构建多学科期刊群在线开放评议出版模式。【结果】构建多学科期刊群在线开放评议、快速多维度评论及评分、读者对评审人员的评审进行评议及打分的科学评审出版模式。【结论】新的模式具有免费、开放、透明、合作、交互、高效、共享等特点,可实现开放数据、开放评议、开放获取相结合。 [ Purposes] This study aims to build an online open review and publishing model for multi-disciplinary journal groups, and provides reference and guidance for domestic academic journals. [ Methods ] We analyzed the shortcomings of the current scientific review and publication system in terms of delayed publication, opacity, and objectivity, and proposed to expand the function of multi-disciplinary preprinted warehousing and build an online open evaluation publishing mode for multi-disciplinary journal groups. [ Findings] The scientific review and publication mode of online open review for multi-disciplinary journal group, rapid multi-dimensional review and scoring, and reader review and scoring on reviewers is constructed.[Conclusions] The new model is free, open, transparent, cooperative, interactive, efficient, and shared. It has realized the combination of open data, open review, and open access.
作者 王凤产 WANG Fengchan(Editorial Office of Journal of Henan Normal University,46 East Jianshe Road,Xinxiang 453007,China)
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期1085-1090,共6页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金 河南师范大学博士科研启动课题(qd15219) 中国高校科技期刊研究会专项(CUJS2017-016)
关键词 开放评议 开放获取 开放数据 科学出版模式 评分 Open review Open access Open data Scientific publishing model Scoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1李武,刘兹恒.一种全新的学术出版模式:开放存取出版模式探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2004,30(6):66-69. 被引量:199
  • 2王波.Web2.0环境下的图书情报期刊2.0[J].数字图书馆论坛,2006(12):29-35. 被引量:4
  • 3沈锡宾,王爱华,汪谋岳,郝秀原,吕小东,孙静,郭睿.开放存取——《中华医学杂志(英文版)》之实践[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(3):460-462. 被引量:9
  • 4Spier R. The history of the peer-review process [ J]. Trends inBiotechnology, 2002,20(8) : 357 -358.
  • 5van Rooyen S,Godlee F,Evans S,et al. Effect of open peerreview on quality of reviews and on reviewers,recommendations :A randomised trial [ J ]. British Medical Journal,1999,318.7175) :23 -27.
  • 6Groves T,Khan K. Is open peer review the fairest system. [ J]British Medical Journal’ 2010, 341(7782) : 1082 -1083.
  • 7Perakakis P, Taylor M, Mazza M, et al. Understanding the roleof open peer review and dynamic academic articles [ J ].Scientometrics,2011,88(2) : 669 -673.
  • 8Pros and cons of open peer review [ J ]. Nature Neuroscience,1999, 2(3):197.
  • 9Starkschall G. Editorial: Peer review vs. open posting [ J ].Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics ,2012,13(5):1-2.
  • 10Melero R, Lopez-Santovena F. Referees,attitudes toward openpeer review and electronic transmission of papers [ J ]. FoodScience and Technology International. 2001, 7(6) : 521 -527.

共引文献67

同被引文献76

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部