期刊文献+

家庭背景对本科生学业成绩的影响会随年级改变吗——基于我国85所院校的实证研究 被引量:7

Does the Influence of Family Background on Undergraduate Academic Performance Change with Grade——Empirical Research Based on 85 Colleges and Universities in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于2014年全国"高等理科教育(本科)改革"学生调查数据,分析了家庭背景对本科生学业成绩的影响情况。研究发现,家庭背景变量中母亲受教育年限、父亲职业地位对学业成绩有显著影响,且大一时影响最大,影响程度随就读年级的升高逐渐下降。夏普里值分解进一步显示,家庭背景对学业成绩差异的贡献份额相对较小,且随受教育时间增加呈下降趋势。基于这一研究结果进行讨论,并提出相关建议。 Based on the 2014 National "Higher Science Education (Undergraduate) Reform" student survey data, this paper analyzed the impact of family background on undergraduate academic performance. It found that mother's years of education and father's occupational status had a significant impact on academic performance and the greatest impact was in the freshman year, but the degree of influence gradually decreased with the increase of the grade. The Sharpley value decomposition further showed that the contribution of family background to the difference in academic performance is relatively small and tended to decrease with the increase of education time. Based on the results of this research, this paper discussed and proposed relevant recommendations.
作者 陈少毅 陈晓宇 Chen Shaoyi;Chen Xiaoyu
机构地区 北京大学
出处 《国家教育行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期62-71,共10页 Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基金 教育部高等教育司委托课题
关键词 家庭背景 学业成绩 年级比较 夏普里值分解 Family background Academic performance Grade comparison Sharpley value decomposition
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献82

  • 1潘懋元.中国当前高等教育发展中的若干问题[J].大学教育科学,2004(4):1-5. 被引量:58
  • 2文东茅.家庭背景对我国高等教育机会及毕业生就业的影响[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(3):58-63. 被引量:281
  • 3李煜.制度变迁与教育不平等的产生机制——中国城市子女的教育获得(1966—2003)[J].中国社会科学,2006(4):97-109. 被引量:423
  • 4教育部.基础教育课程改革指导纲要[N].中国教育报.2001-09-19(4).
  • 5Marks,H. M.. Student engagement in instruc-tional activity: Patterns in the elementary,middle and high schools years [J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2000, (37):153-184.
  • 6Femando Padro. Learner engagement surveys: appli- cations and limitations based on Australian and American ex- perience [EB/OL]. http://otl.c urtin.edu.au/eac2006/papers/ padro.pdf. 2009-03-29.
  • 7Bmphy,J.. Conceptualizing student motivation [J]. Educational Psychologist, 1983, (18) :200-215.
  • 8Natriello,G.. Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools [J]. Jour- nal of Research and Development in Education, 1984, (17): 14-24.
  • 9Newmann,Frcd M.,Gary Wehlage,and Susie D. Lambom. The significance and sources of student engagement [A]. F. Newmann (Ed.). Student engagement and achieve-ment in American secondary schools [C].New York: Teach- ers College Press, 1992.11,11-39.
  • 10Fredricks,J. A.,Blumenfeld,P. C. & Paris,A. H.. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence [J], Review of Educational Research ,2004,74( 1 ): 59-109.

共引文献437

同被引文献85

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部