期刊文献+

动车模型热力除冰实验研究 被引量:1

Experimental Research on Thermal Deicing with EMU Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究动车组高效节能的除冰方法,搭建动车模型热力除冰实验台,采用实验研究的方法,研究热风除冰的除冰速率和能耗,并分析不同除冰方式对室内温度的影响。创新性地提出把红外线加热技术应用于动车除冰,并且对红外线除冰进行了相应研究。实验结果表明:在实验设定工况下,红外线除冰最短需要66 min,而热风除冰最短则需要142 min,红外线除冰速率比热风除冰速率提高53.5%,所以红外线除冰的速率远高于热风除冰;红外线除冰在加热距离为0.5 m时,除冰能耗仅为6.6 kW·h,远低于热风除冰的耗能18.5 kW·h,此时红外线除冰的能耗为热风融冰能耗的35.7%。 In order to study the efficiency and energy saving of the deicing method for EMU,a thermal deicing experimental table of train model is set up. The method of experiment research is adopted to study the rate and energy consumption of the hot air deicing and analyze the influences of different deicing methods on indoor temperature. The infrared heating technology is proposed for deicing and its efficiency is studied. The experimental results show that under the experimental conditions,the shortest infrared deicing time is 66 min,while the shortest hot air deicing time requires 142 min. The rate of infrared deicing is 53. 5% higher than that of the hot air deicing. Therefore,the rate of infrared deicing is much higher than that of the hot air deicing. The infrared deicing energy consumption is only 6. 6 kW·h,when the infrared deicing distance is 0. 5 cm,covering 35. 7% of the energy consumption of the hot air melting.
作者 邓保顺 沈德安 董建锴 谢腾 DENG Bao-shun;SHEN De-an;DONG Jian-kai;XIE Teng(China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co.,Ltd.,Xi'an 710043,China;School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China)
出处 《铁道标准设计》 北大核心 2018年第6期185-189,共5页 Railway Standard Design
基金 中国铁道建筑总公司科研专题项目(14-C55)
关键词 动车模型 热风除冰 红外线除冰 能耗 EMU model Hot air deicing Infrared deicing Energy consumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献20

  • 1刘磊,朱晓.激光除冰研究[J].光散射学报,2006,18(4):379-385. 被引量:11
  • 2宾任祥主编.铁路连输安全管理概论[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,2002..
  • 3中国铁道科学研究院电子计算技术研究所.建立行车安全监控中心研究[R].北京:中国铁道科学研究院电子计算技术研究所,2008.
  • 4Philipp J., Kai U. T., Ingrid K. K.. Transport and anaerobic biodegradation of propylene glycol in gravel-rich soil materials[J] Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2006, 85(3-4): 271-286
  • 5Steven R. C., Steven W. G., Jorge E. Loyo R., Clifford P. R.. Aquatic toxicity of nine aircraft deicer and anti-icer formulations and relative toxicity of additive package ingredients alkylphenol ethoxylates and 4, 5-methyl-lH-benzotriazoles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(23): 7409-7415.
  • 6Charles A. S., James B. W., Gordon R. C., Kathleen M. R.. Fate, effects and potential environment risks of ethylene glycol: a review[J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 43(3): 377-383.
  • 7Robert A. K., Donald A., Pierre Y. C., Scott T.. Canadian water quality guidelines for glycols-An ecotoxicological review of glycols and associated aircraft anti-icing and deicing fluids[J]. Environmental Toxicology, 1999, 14(5): 481-522.
  • 8Chew C. J., Seel T. P.. Method of, and apparatus for, de-icing an aircraft by infrared radiation[P]. CN 1185136, 1998-06-17.
  • 9Chew C. J., Seel T. P.. Method of, and apparatus for, de-icing an aircraft by infrared radiation[P]. US5417389, 1995-05-23.
  • 10White R. P.. Infrared deicing system for aircraft[P]. WO9856657, 1998-12-17.

共引文献53

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部