自助游“驴友”遇险时“驴头”的责任分析

An Analysis of the Responsibility of Organizers in the Disturbance of “Tour pal”

“驴友”在自助游活动中遇险后，作为组织者或发起人的“驴头”应否承担损害赔偿责任？其是否对“驴友”负有安全保障义务？宜对当前司法实务及学理争议做统一梳理，明确自助游活动中，“驴头”应当承担一般过错侵权责任，但不负有“合理限度范围内的安全保障义务”，进而认定“驴友”因意外事故遇险时，“驴头”不承担因违反安全保障义务的侵权责任。此外，应对法院在此类案件中滥用公平责任原则的行为予以纠正，认定“驴头”在对损害的发生无过错时，无需承担公平责任。最后，自助游户外探险活动中，宜确立和援引自甘冒险规则，除去桎梏在“驴头”身上的枷锁。

If the ＂tour pal＂ encountered an accident in the self - help travel, whether the organizers bear the fault of tort liability Whether he is responsible for the security obligations. It is advisable to make a combing of the current ju- dicial practice and theory, so that in the self - help travel, the organizers should bear the general tort liability, but do not have ＂reasonable limits within the scope of security obligations＂. So that when the ＂tour pal＂ suffered an accident, the organizers wouldn＇t bear tort liability. In addition, the court should correet its misuse of the principle of fair liability, without fault for the occurrenee of damage, the organizers does not need to bear fair responsibility. Finally, in the self- help travel, we should establish and invoke assumption of risk and remove the shackles of the organizers.