摘要
我国夫妻约定财产制采独创式立法例,婚内财产分割协议属夫妻财产制契约。基于婚内财产分割协议引起不动产物权变动若严格按照以"登记"为物权变动判断的唯一标准,会导致钢化性的结果。应当承认该协议具有直接引起不动产物权变动的效力,并采"登记对抗主义",一方面是由于其本身的伦理特性,另一方面,"登记"公示为外部交易安全保护之需,夫妻内部物权归属可酌情不适用登记生效主义。至于登记对抗第三人的范围,一般情况下,该第三人指与不动产存在交易关系的第三人,而不包括继承人和债权人。
The domestic marital property division agreement is the marital property agreement because the contractual property system of Marriage Law of PRC is the original contractual property system. The judgment will be rigid if we judge the transference of the real property according to the register. so it can directly produce the effect of the transfer of the property and take the register antagonism in the pattern of change of ownership,because in the one hand,the purpose of registration is to protect outside transaction security,on the other hand,the ownership of property within husband and wife can not be applied in the registration effectiveness. The scope of implementation force of the third person include the real estate-buying person not the heir and the creditor.
作者
代雪
Dai Xue(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2017年第4期137-143,共7页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
婚内财产分割协议
不动产物权变动
登记对抗主义
第三人
The Domestic Marital Property Division Agreement
The Real Right Alternation
Registration Antago-nism
The Third Person