期刊文献+

基准线法下企业最优碳减排和产品定价决策 被引量:4

Optimal Decisions of Carbon Emission Reduction and Production Pricing under Benchmarking Free Allocation of Carbon Permits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基准线法是碳限额与交易制度中免费碳配额分配的常用方法之一,其实施关键是确定碳排放基准值,即企业所处行业单位产品碳排放量的平均值。假定有政府和企业两个决策体,政府作为领导者以社会福利最大化为决策目标,决策最优碳排放基准值;生产企业作为跟随者以利润最大化为决策目标,决策企业碳减排水平和产品定价。通过构建政府社会福利最大化与企业利润最大化斯坦伯格博弈模型,探讨基准线法下政府最优碳排放基准值设定、企业最优碳减排决策和产品定价策略。研究表明:政府最优碳排放基准值的设定与政府碳减排目标、未减排时单位产品的生产成本、碳排放量和环境影响正相关,与消费者低碳意识负相关。企业的最优碳减排水平决策和最优定价决策,主要受政府碳排放基准值、未减排时单位产品的环境影响成本和消费者低碳意识等因素影响。 One of the commonly used modes for free carbon allocation permits in carbon cap and trade mechanism is benchmarking. For benchmarking mode,the key is to determine the optimal carbon emission per unit of product. This paper assumes that there are two decision-makers:the government and the enterprise. The government as a leader determines the optimal carbon emission value with the goal of social welfare maximization. Then the manufacturing enterprise as a follower determines the carbon emission reduction level and production pricing with the goal of profit maximization. By constructing a Stackelberg game model of maximizing government social welfare and maximizing enterprise profit,this paper discusses the setting of the government optimal carbon emission baseline and the decision of the enterprise optimal carbon emission reduction and production pricing.Results show that the government's optimal carbon emission benchmark is increasing in the government's carbon emission reduction target, the production cost per unit product, as well as the carbon emission and environmental impact when no emission reduction occurs. However, the benchmark is decreasing in consumers' low carbon awareness. The enterprise's optimal carbon emission reduction decision and product pricing decision are mainly affected by the government's carbon emission benchmark, the environmental impact cost per unit product when no emission reduction occurs, as well as the low carbon awareness of consumers.
作者 常香云 李银萍 王珊 范体军 CHANG Xiangyun;LI Yinping;WANG Shah;FAN Tijun(The Department of Management Science and Engineering,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China)
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期1-8,共8页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(71431004) 国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(71473085 71573087) 上海市浦江人才计划项目资助(14PJC020) 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目资助(2014FGL003)
关键词 基准线法 碳减排决策 产品定价 斯坦伯格博弈 benchmarking carbon emission reduction product pricing Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献98

  • 1杜婷婷,毛锋,罗锐.中国经济增长与CO_2排放演化探析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(2):94-99. 被引量:152
  • 2Asselt, H. Study on the effectiveness of the EU ETS: the EU ETS in the European climate policy mix: past, present and future [ R ]. Amstektam: Vrije Univeiteit, ADAM Report Pnject 018476 - GOCE. 2009.8.
  • 3十一五规划纲要确定的节能减排约束性目标完成[EB/0L].金融界网站,2011-06-15.
  • 4Matthes F. and Neuhtff, K. Auctioning in the uropeau L-nion Emissions Trading Scheme [ R ]. Report commissioned by WWF. 2007.9.
  • 5Holt, C. , Shobe, W. , Burtraw, D. , Palmer, K. , & Goer- ee, J. K. Auction Design for Selling CO2 Emission Allowances under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative[ R]. Albany: New York State Energ'y Research and Development Authority. 2007.10.
  • 6Benchmarks as a basis for allocation of emission allowances in the energy sector[ EB/OL]. http ://. energimyndigheten, se/Glob- al/Engelska/Energy% 20efficiency/CO2% 20benchmarks% 20 -% 20pilot% 20study. pdf.
  • 7David Harrison, Daniel B. Radov. Evaluation of Alternative Initial Allocation Mechanisms in a European Union Greenhouse Gas E- missions Allowance Trading Scheme [ R ]. National Economic Research Associates (NERA). 2002.3.
  • 8Economic and Allocation Advisory Committee. Allocating E- missions Allowances Under a California Cap - and - Trade Program [ EB/OL]. http ://www. climatechange, ca. gov/eaac/,2010.3.
  • 9Matthes F. and Neuhoff, K. Auctioning in tbe European U- nion Emissions Trading Scheme [ R ]. Report commissioned by WWF.2007.9.
  • 10Cramton, Peter & Kerr, Suzi. Tradeable carbon permit auc- tions: How and why to auction not grandfather [ J ]. Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), 2002.3.

共引文献284

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部