1Hodson, D. Re- thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science [ J ]. Studies in science education. 1993, (22) , 85 - 142.
2Bevan McGuiness, Wolff Michael Roth and Penny J. Gilmer). Laboratories. In John Wallace, & William Louden (Eds). Dilemmas of science teaching: perspectives on problems of practice[ M]. London.. Routledge Falmer. 2002 : 36 - 40.
3Toulmin S.E. The use of argument[M]. London: Cambridge University Press. 1958 : 87 - 99.
4黄翎斐 胡瑞萍.论证与科学教育的理论和实务.科学教育月刊,2006,.
5Osborne J. , Erduran S. , Simon S. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school Science -J ]. Journal of research in science teaching. 2004, (41), 994 - 1020.
6Kuhn D. The skills of argument[M]. New York: Cambridge university press. 1991,44- 204.
7Duschl R. A., Osborne J. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education [ J ]. Studies in science education. 2002, (38) ,39 - 72.
8Herrenkohl, L., & Guerra, M. Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade[J ]. Cognition and Instruction. 1998,16(4), 431 - 473.
9Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2002,39(1), 35 -62.
10Simonneaux, L. Role- play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education. 2001, 23(9), 903 - 927.
