期刊文献+

基于因果行为轮廓的多重变迁集行为一致性分析

Behavioral Conformance Analysis of Multi-set Transition Based on Causal Behavioral Profile
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多重变迁集的行为一致性分析是业务流程管理的关键问题。现有的研究方法主要是通过重名变迁的处理分析相关模型的行为一致性,计算复杂且结果不可信,所以对快速准确地测量含重名变迁的模型间行为一致性程度具有一定的局限性。首先在多重变迁集的基础上扩展了行为约束的4个弱序关系,避免了使用行为轮廓分析行为一致性的不准确性,然后提出了一种测量模型变迁对的行为一致性度的算法,从而得到基于因果行为轮廓的多重变迁集的行为一致性测量方法,最后通过实例验证了该方法的有效性。 Behavioral conformance analysis of multi-set transition is the key issue of business process management.Currently,the research on the behavior conformance analysis between the models with the transitions owning the same name is mainly to deal with the transitions having the same name,and then carry on the behavior conformance analysis,which has some limitation on complex calculation and unreliable results.Firstly,on the basis of multi-set transitions,by analyzing four kinds of weak order relations of transitions in casual behavioral profiles of process models,the inaccuracy of behavioral consistency is avoided by using behavioral profile.Then,an algorithm is proposed to measure the behavioral consistency degree over transition pairs and a method is obtained for computing the degree of consistency of casual behavioral profile of corresponding models containing repeat activities.The specific example shows that the method is very effective.
出处 《长江大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2017年第13期60-62,74-75,共5页 Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61402011 61572035) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1508085MF111) 安徽省高校自然科学基金重点项目(KJ2014A067)
关键词 多重变迁集 因果行为轮廓 PETRI网 行为一致性 multi-set transition casual behavioral profile Petri net behavioral conformance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Gottschalk F, van der Aalst W M P, Jansen-Vullers M H, et al. Configurable workfiow models [J]. Cooperative Informa- tion Systems, 2008, 17 (2): 77-221.
  • 2van Dongen B F, Dijkman R M, Mendling J. Measuring simi- larity between business process models [C] //Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008: 450-464.
  • 3Matthias Weidlich, Jan Mendling. Perceived consistency be- tween process models [J]. Information Systems, 2012, 37 (2) : 80-98.
  • 4Matthias Weidlich, Jan Mendiing, Mathias Weske. Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models [J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2011, 37 (3): 410-429.
  • 5van Dongen B F, Mendling J, van der Aalst W M P. Structu- ral patterns for soundness of business process models [C] // Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2006: 116-128.
  • 6Remeo Dijkman, Marion Dumas, Boudewijn van Dongen, et al. Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evalua- tion [J]. Information Systems, 2011, 36 (2): 498-516.
  • 7Johannes Koskinen, Markus Kettunen, Tarja Syst& Beha vioral profiles-a way to model and validate program behavior [J]. Soft- ware-Practice & Experieance, 2010, 40 (8): 701-733.
  • 8Matthias Weidlieh, Artem Polyvyanyy, Nirmit Desai, et al. Process compliance analysis based on behavioural profiles [J]. Information Systems, 2011, 36 (7): 1009-1025.
  • 9Lu R, Sadiq S, Governatori G. Measurement of compliance distance in business processes [J]. Information System Ma nagement, 2008, 25 (4): 344-355.
  • 10Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros, Wil M P van der Aalst, Wei- jters A J M M. Quantifying process equivalence based on ob- served behavior [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2008, 64 (1): 55-74.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部