摘要
德国法上的专利间接侵权制度乃是判例法的产物,后被法典化,构成一种独立的专利侵权类型,旨在减轻专利权人行使其权利的难度,从而扩充对其权利保护的范围。本文以在德国法学界和经济界产生较大影响的"Nespresso咖啡胶囊案"为出发点,以德国《专利法》第10条以及德国联邦最高法院系列判例为基础,总结分析间接侵权构成要件理论的发展趋势,并比较分析北京高院《意见2001》和《指南2013》的相关规定,最后探讨此理论发展趋势对我国是否以及如何建构专利间接侵权制度以及对我国企业专利战略的启示意义。
In the German Law was the indirect patent infringement as an independent legal institution was primarily developed through case law and then codified under Section 10 Patent Law.It aims to reduce the difficulty of the patentee by enforcement of the patented invention and therefore to enlarge the protection scope.This essay takes the Nespressocoffee capsule decisions by a German court as the starting point,based on the introduction of the indirect patent infringement in German Patent Law(Section 10)and the relevant case law of the Federal Court of Justice,discusses further the new development in the German Law and his enlightening significance both for the establishment of relevant legal instrument in Chinese legal system and for the patent strategies of the Chinese enterprises.
出处
《财经法学》
2015年第3期115-126,共12页
Law and Economy
关键词
专利间接侵权
构成要件
权利耗尽原则
Indirect Patent Infringement
Elements of an Offense
Exhaustion of Rights
