期刊文献+

城镇化视角下三峡库区重庆段水生态安全评价 被引量:6

AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL SAFETY EVALUATION UNDER URBANIZATION PERSPECTIVE IN THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR IN CHONGQING
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于驱动力—压力—状态—影响—响应(DPSIR)框架选取25个能反映水生态安全状态的指标,通过指标权重确定、数据标准化处理和水生态安全评价模型的构建,以三峡库区重庆段为例,从城镇化视角分析三峡库区重庆段自2007年三峡库区水位达156m高程以来的水生态安全状态。为了使AHP所确定的指标更客观,运用熵权对AHP进行修正,得到综合权重值来表示指标的权重。分析结果表明:三峡库区重庆段水生态安全自2007年三峡库区水位达156m高程至2010年三峡水库蓄水达到175m最终水位水生态一直处于不安全状态,2011~2012年升至警戒状态,总体趋势在逐年升高。影响三峡库区重庆段水生态安全的劣势因子是资源环境压力,其次是资源环境影响;影响三峡库区重庆段生态安全程度的优势因子是经济社会驱动力和经济社会响应。由权重值判断生态安全影响程度,资源环境影响对三峡库区重庆段水生态影响最大,其次是资源环境压力,影响最小的是资源环境状态。从指标层来看,对三峡库区重庆段水生态安全影响最大的前3个因素依次是灾害损失、万元GDP用水量、万元工业增加值用水量;影响最小的是水土流失面积比例。 Based on the Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response(DPSIR)conceptual model,25 indexes which can reflect the state of aquatic ecological security were selected.The aquatic ecological security state of Three Gorges in Chong Qing section since 2007 when the water level reached 156 meters was evaluated from the perspective of urbanization via the methods of determining indexes weight,standardizing data and building aquatic ecological security evaluation model.In order to objectify the indexes determined by AHP,entropy weight was used to correct AHP,and the weights of indexes were indicated by integrated weights.The results showed that,from 2007 when water level reached 156 meters to 2010 when water level reached 175 meters,the aquatic ecological state of Chong Qing section was unsafe,which was on alert from 2011 to 2012,and the overall trend is increasingly year by year.The primary negative factors that affect the aquatic ecological security of Three Gorges in Chong Qing section was resource and environmental pressure,the secondary was resource and environmental response.The advantage factors that affect the aquatic ecological security of Three Gorges in Chong Qing section are economic and social driving force and response.When the influence of ecological safety was estimated by indexes weight,what affected the aquatic ecological security the most in Chong Qing section was resource and environmental impact,the next was resource and environmental pressure,while the least-affected factor was resource and environmental status.From the perspective of index layer,three factors which affected aquatic ecological security the most were losses from disaster,water consumption per 10 000 yuan GDP and water consumption per 10 000 yuan industrial added value,while the minimal impact factor was the proportion of soil erosion area.
出处 《长江流域资源与环境》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第S1期213-220,共8页 Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项三峡水库水污染综合防治技术及工程示范项目(2012ZX07104-001)
关键词 DPSIR模型 三峡库区重庆段 城镇化 生态安全 DPSIR model Three Gorges Reservoir Area in Chongqing security urbanization ecological safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1朱翔,李静芝.洞庭湖区城镇化对水资源利用的综合影响评价研究[A]. 湖南省农业系统工程学会2012年年会论文集[C]. 2012
  • 2Nikolaos Th. Skoulikidis.The environmental state of rivers in the Balkans—A review within the DPSIR framework[J]. Science of the Total Environment . 2009 (8)
  • 3Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR[J]. Land Use Policy . 2007 (1)
  • 4David Niemeijer,Rudolf S. Groot.Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability . 2008 (1)
  • 5Silvia Focardi,Ilaria Corsi,Stefania Mazzuoli,Leonardo Vignoli,Steven A. Loiselle,Silvano Focardi.Integrating Remote Sensing Approach with Pollution Monitoring Tools for Aquatic Ecosystem Risk Assessment and Managment: A Case Study of Lake Victoria(UGANDA)[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment . 2006 (1)
  • 6Wataru Naito,Ken-ichi Miyamoto,Junko Nakanishi,Shigeki Masunaga,Steven M Bartell.Application of an ecosystem model for aquatic ecological risk assessment of chemicals for a Japanese lake[J]. Water Research . 2001 (1)

同被引文献138

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部