期刊文献+

TPP的投资区位效应及非TPP亚太国家的应对措施——基于多国自由资本模型的分析 被引量:25

TPP's Investment Location Domino Effect and Non-TPP Asia-Pacific Countries' Countermeasures:Analysis Based on R-FC Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章以跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)为基础,结合区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP),引入多国自由资本模型,数值模拟了TPP的投资区位效应及非TPP亚太国家的应对措施。结果表明:(1)TPP的形成会导致双重投资区位效应:在TPP内部,规模大的国家将拥有更多的工业品市场份额,成为核心国;在TPP外部,随着TPP内部贸易自由度的提高,外部国家的投资会流向TPP成员国,进一步放大投资区位效应。双重投资区位效应左右着亚太地区国际生产布局。(2)作为应对措施,RCEP的提前达成将是一个不错的现实选择;若RCEP与TPP同时达成,则具有TPP和RCEP双重身份的国家获益最大。因此,中国应积极同TPP成员国签订双边或多边FTA,主动参与东盟主导的RCEP,最大限度地减少TPP的冲击。 Based on the Trans-Pacific Partnership(TPP)and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP),this paper numerically simulates TPP's investment location domino effect and non-TPP Asia-Pacific countries' countermeasures by the introduction of R-FC model.It reaches the following conclusions:firstly,the formation of TPP leads to dual investment location domino effect,namely in internal TPP,large countries possess greater industrial product market share,thereby becoming the core countries,and outside the TPP,the investment of non-TPP countries flows into to the members of TPP with the rise in trade freedom inside the TPP,further amplifying the investment location domino effect;the dual investment location domino effect determines the international production allocation in the Asia-Pacific region;secondly,as the countermeasure,the accomplishment of RCEP in advance will be a good real choice;if RCEP and TPP are reached simultaneously,the countries as TPP and RCEP members will benefit most.Therefore,in order to minimize the impact of the TPP,China should actively sign a bilateral or multilateral FTA with TPP members and initiatively participate in RCEP led by ASEAN.
作者 许培源 魏丹
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期77-87,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 华侨大学海上丝绸之路研究基金重点项目(HSZD2014-03)资助
关键词 TPP 投资区位效应 多国自由资本模型 RCEP TPP investment location domino effect R-FC model RCEP
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献61

  • 1梁琦.空间经济学:过去、现在与未来——兼评《空间经济学:城市、区域与国际贸易》[J].经济学(季刊),2005,4(4):1067-1086. 被引量:104
  • 2李向阳.国际经济规则的形成机制[J].世界经济与政治,2006(9):67-76. 被引量:66
  • 3Viner Jacob, The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowmen for International Peace, 1950.
  • 4Murray Kemp and Henry Wan, Jr. , "An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Unions", in Murray Kemp, Three Topics in the Theory of International Trade : Distribution, Welfare and Uncertainty, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976.
  • 5Pravin Krishna and Arvind Panagariya, "On Necessarily Welfare-Enhancing Free Trade Areas", Journal of International Economics, Vol. 57, Issue 2, 2002, pp. 353-367.
  • 6Kimberley A. Clausing, "Trade Creation aud Trade Diversion in the Canada-U. S. Free Trade Agreement", C.anadianJournal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, August, 2001, pp. 677-696.
  • 7John Romalis, "NAFTA's and CUSFTA's Impact on North American Trade", University of Chieago, manuscript, 2002.
  • 8John McCallum, "National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns", American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1995, pp. 615-623.
  • 9Scott Baier and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, "On the Endogeneity of International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreements", University of Notre Dame, manuscript, 2002.
  • 10Christopher Magee, "Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements: An Empirical Analysis", Bucknell University, manuscript, 2003.

共引文献310

同被引文献296

引证文献25

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部