期刊文献+

DOMINANT PLANTS RELOCATIONS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS IN CHINA'S SOCIALIST DEMOCRACY

支柱企业搬迁与中国社会主义民主政治中的财产权观念(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 Dominant plant relocations have the potential to adversely affect a vast number of laid-off workers and their communities. Chinese commentators generally follow many U. S. economists and lawyers in thinking that the impact of dominant plant relocations will be the inevitable result of the adoption of a market economy,and that the freedom to relocate plants,will ultimately promote social efficiency. By comparative analysis,this article will demonstrate how U. S. policies grant plants near-absolute freedom to relocate, In contrast, some EU countries take employee interests into account through employee involvement in corporate decision making. This enormous divergence in policy is largely driven by different concepts of efficiency,property right and democracy. The prevailing view in both the U. S. and China,that dominant plant relocations are inherently socially efficient,is arguable at best. Social efficiency in itself does not justify the full freedom for dominant plants to relocate. The failure of U. S. policy analysts and policymakers to distinguish dominant plants from non-dominant plants,has prevented them from developing alternative policies to remedy these issues in the U. S. more effectively. China's socialist democracy embodies the concept of equal access to necessary property,and this concept is fundamental to the socialist democratic way of life. Specifically, this principle establishes people's rights to employment in the community where they were born or have lived for an extended period of time. Dominant plant relocations effectively render this right unachievable. This,combined with my critique of the efficiency claim,suggests that China must reject the U. S. approach and make progressive regulations regarding plants' freedom to relocate. 支柱企业的跨区域搬迁具有引发巨大负外部社会效应的风险,很可能给雇员和社区整体造成持续性、重大物质损害和非物质影响。本文观察到,自20世纪60年代以来,除了美国所采的几近绝对自由的企业搬迁法律政策外,我们还能够观察到一些欧洲国家所采取了不同的法律政策,在一定程度上缓解甚至避免了支柱企业搬迁活动的负外部社会效应。本文初步表明,美国观察者及其中国追随者的观点具有很大的误导性,因为他们没有深入观察"支柱企业"和"非支柱企业"的重大差异,忽视了前者可能引发的巨大负外部性。中国需要吸取美国近半个世纪以来的教训。本文认为,"平等的社会财富获取机会"是我国社会主义民主政治所蕴含的一项基本价值追求。在市场经济背景下,劳动和市场交换是实现该价值的主要渠道。一些支柱企业搬迁不仅是不效率的,而且从根本上阻碍大量公民去平等地获取社会财富。法律有必要对其予以适度管制,以缓解或避免其造成的重大负面影响。
作者 熊丙万
出处 《China Legal Science》 2013年第2期83-111,共29页 中国法学(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献187

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部