期刊文献+

ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE CONFIGURATION IN PEREMPTORY NORMS OF CHINESE COMPANY LAW

我国公司法强制性规范立法配置完善研究:以市场与政府关系为视角(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 Arguably,one way of solving such problems as asymmetry information,unfair transaction and external negative effects in the field of the Company Law where the objective existence of market failure suggests the necessity for government intervention in it,is to provide peremptory norms for them. However,peremptory norms of the Company Law cannot be ubiquitous as market failure also exists in the process of the government's intervention in the market economy. Therefore,legislative configuration of the Company Law through peremptory norms shall have both boundaries and standards. Whether this could better solve problems than market regulation becomes its standard. With the improvement of the market economy in China,Company Law of the PRC shall gradually reduce peremptory norms of the government's intervention in the market. 市场失灵在公司法领域的客观存在,表明公司法领域市场失灵也需要政府干预,手段之一即是通过强制性规范解决公司法领域的信息不对称、不公平交易、外部负效应等问题。由于政府在对市场经济进行干预的过程中,也存在着失灵现象,因此公司法强制性规范并不能无处不在,其立法配置必须有边界和标准。是否能比市场调节更好的解决问题是我国公司法强制性规范立法配置的标准。随着我国市场经济的进一步完善,我国公司法应逐步减少政府干预市场的强制性规范。
出处 《China Legal Science》 2014年第3期66-91,共26页 中国法学(英文版)
基金 one phase of the National Social Science Foundation Project(13BFX097),entitled"Study on Distinguish Theory and Legislation of State Owned Enterprises"
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1伊斯特布鲁克,费希尔.公司法的经济结构[M].张建伟,罗培新译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 2H.Henn&J.Alexander,Laws of Corporations and Other Business Associations,534--36(3d ed.1983).
  • 3see Joel Seligman,Stock Exchange Rules Affecting Takeovers and Control Transactions,in Knights,Raiders&Targets,J.Coffee,L.Lowenstein&S.Rose-Ackerman eds.Oxford University Press,1988.
  • 4Timothy K.O’Neil,Rule19c-4:The SEC Goes Too Far in Adopting a One Share,One Vote Rule,83Nw.U.L.Rev.1057.
  • 5Louis Lowenstein,Shareholder Voting Rights:A Response to SEC Rule19c--4and to Professor Gilson,89 Colum.L.Rev.979(1989).
  • 6Douglas C.Ashton,Revisiting Dual-Class Stock,68St.John’s L.Rev.863(1994).
  • 7Roberta S.Karmel,Qualitative Standards for“Qualified Securities”:SEC Regulation of Voting Rights,36 Cath.U.L.Rev.809(1987).
  • 8Peter N.Flocost,Toward a Liability Rule Approach to the“one share,one vote”controversy:an Epitaph for t he SEC’S Rule19c-4,138U.Pa.L.Rev.1761.
  • 9Daniel R.Fischel,Organized Exchanges and the Regulation of Dual Class Common Stock,54U.Chi.L.Rev.119.
  • 10Louis Lowenstein,Shareholder Voting Rights:a Response to SEC Rule19c-4and to Professor Gilson,89 Colum.L.Rev.979.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部