期刊文献+

行政诉讼法修订刍议(英文)

REFLECTIONS ON THE AMENDMENT OF CHINESE ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION LAW
原文传递
导出
摘要 《行政诉讼法》自1989年实施以来面临第一次修订。本文追溯了1949年以来《行政诉讼法》的发展历程,回顾了最初的实施及目前的现状,重点梳理了促成此次修订的若干因素。随后,从文本出发,通过对比原法条文和三轮修订稿,从规范层面探讨了修订涉及的核心话题,如诉讼功能、受案范围、原告资格、审判体制及判决等,通过对以上素材的分析展现修法面临的核心争议及路径选择。本次修订解决了诸多实质性问题,但仍有缺憾。 The Chinese Administrative Litigation Law( ALL) went into effect in the year 1989. However,after over 20 years of practice,several systematic deficiencies have surfaced,mostly because it was borrowed from overseas,in particular Germany, this reference or transfer was incomplete and inaccurate. Besides, the Chinese economy has seen extraordinary development since the inception of reform and opening up since 1978. The economic achievement has been prompting every social sector into change,for adaptation,no exception in the field of law as well. At last the openness in economy has also enhanced the awareness of property and political rights protection among the people,and thus posed a serious challenge to the unitary rights protection system. Therefore,it is consensus to amend the ALL,make it reach the need of the society,a pathway to the democratic and welfare society.
作者 刘筱娟
出处 《China Legal Science》 2015年第2期104-128,共25页 中国法学(英文版)
基金 one of the research findings of "Radical Transformation of Government Function from the Perspective of Super-ministry Reform" a major project of National Social Sciences Fund(Grant No.13&ZD034)
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1R.v North Somerset DCEx p.Garnett. Env.L.R.91 . 1998
  • 2HARRY WOOLF,JEFFREY JOWELL,ANDREW LE SUEUR.DE SMITH’’S JUDICIAL REVIEW. . 2007
  • 3Ying Songnian.Relevant Issues of Amending the Administrative Litigation Law. Legal Information . 2011
  • 4http://www.court.gov.cn .
  • 5COMMON PROGRAM OF THE CHINESE PEOPLE’’S POLITICAL CONSULTATIVE CONFERENCE. http://www.lawlib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=283576 . 2014
  • 6Yang Lingping.The Ten Major Issues in Amending the Administrative Litigation Law. Journal of National Prosecutors College . 2013
  • 7Huang Renyu.China:A Macro History. . 2006
  • 8Mo Yuchuan,et al.Orientation,Key Points and Plans for Amending'Administrative Litigation Law':Suggestions from Experts of Renmin University of China. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law . 2012
  • 9Zhu Haihong.Approaches to Resolving Substantial Administrative Disputes. the 2012 Annual Meeting of Beijing Law Society Administrative Law Association . 2012
  • 10http://www.chinalaw.gov.cn . 2014

二级参考文献18

  • 1“关于《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》修正案(草案)的说明”.载中国人大网:http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/lfzt/2014/2013-12/31/content_1822189.htm.
  • 2马良骥.《对历史遗留的落实政策性质的房地产案件的处理--浙江高院裁定徐勤书诉苍南县人民政府其他行政行为案》,载《人民法院报》2012年10月25日第6版.
  • 3《最高人民法院关于贯彻执行(中华人民共和国行政诉讼法)若干问题的解释》(2000年3月8日,法释[2000]8号).
  • 4《最高人民法院关于行政诉讼证据若干问题的规定》(2002年7月24日,法释[2002]21号).
  • 5《最高人民法院关于行政案件管辖若干问题的规定》(2008年1月14日,法释[2008]1号).
  • 6《最高人民法院关于行政诉讼撤诉若干问题的规定》(2008年1月14日,法释[2008]2号).
  • 7习近平.《切实把思想统一到党的十八届三中全会上来》,载《人民日报》2014年1月1日.
  • 8《26个州状告奥巴马医改法案违宪》,http://news.163.com/11/0120/06/6QQRKHlF00014AED.html.
  • 9《美国司法部起诉亚利桑那州移民新法违宪》,http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2010/07-07/2385538.shtml.
  • 10《中华人民共和国宪法》第41条的规定.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部