A DISCUSSION ON CRIME AND PUNISHMENT OF WU YING FUND-RAISING FRAUD FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF VIKTIMODOGMATIK
从被害人信条学论吴英集资诈骗案（英文）
摘要
Since the 1970s when Viktimodogmatik developed gradually in Germany,it has advocated to judge the crime from the perspective of victim rather than only from the actor in conventional criminal law.In the case of Wu Ying fund-raising fraud,11 direct victims were joint usury speculators without cognition error,therefore it does not meet the constitutive requirement of fund-raising fraud.Considering the
参考文献8
-
1BAI JIANJUN.RELATIONSHIP CRIMINOLOGY. . 2005
-
2CLAUS ROXIN,Wang Shizhou trans.CRIMINAL LAW. . 2005
-
3GUO JIANAN.VICTIMOLOGY IN CRIME. . 1997
-
4HANS JOACHIM SCHNEIDER,Wu Xintao,Ma Junyu trans.CRIMANOLOGY. . 1990
-
5SHEN LIUHUA.A STUDY ON VIKTIMODOGMATIK IN CRIMINAL LAW IN GERMANY. . 2011
-
6Journal of Women s Health .
-
7冯军.刑法中的自我答责[J].中国法学,2006(3):93-103. 被引量：212
-
8Gao Yandong.Beyond the Norm of Fraud and Fund-raising Fraud:the Crime and Punishment of Wu Ying Case. Peking University Law Journal . 2012
二级参考文献31
-
1[德]黑格尔 范扬译.《法哲学原理》[M].商务印书馆,1996年版.第197,175页.
-
2[英]霍布斯著 黎思复译.《利维坦》[M].商务印书馆,1996年版.第172-173页.
-
3[英]阿克顿 胡传胜译.《自由史论》[M].[南京]译林出版社,2001年版.第181页.
-
4[德]康德.《实践理性批判》[M].商务印书馆,1999年版..
-
5[德]康德.《纯粹理性批判》,人民出版社,2004年版,第278-279页.
-
6Vgl. Heribert Schumann, Strafrechtliches Handlungsunrecht und das Prinzip der Selbstverantwortung der Anderen, 1986.
-
7Rainer Zaczyk,Strafrechtliches Unrecht und die Selbstverantwortung des Verletzten, 1993.
-
8塩谷毅.自己危殆化への関与と合意にょる他者危殆化につぃて，载《立命館法学》，1996年第3号.
-
9Vgl. Susanne Walther, Eigenverantwortlichkeit und strafrechtliche Zurechnung, 1991.
-
10Vgl. Rainer Zaczyk, Strafrechtliches Unrecht und die Selbstverantwortung des Vedetzten, 1993, S. 19 f.
共引文献211
-
1陈璇.过失犯远因溯责的规制路径:以渎职犯罪为中心[J].中国法学,2023(2):285-304. 被引量：10
-
2金秋实,金燕.自我危险化中被害人答责与参与人的救助义务[J].政法学刊,2024,41(3):75-83.
-
3杨兰.挂失领取本人账下他人存款行为之定性——以“被害人教义学”为视角[J].中山大学研究生学刊（社会科学版）,2019,40(2):51-58.
-
4宋佳恒.因果关系认定中行为对结果的贡献及其危险的现实化[J].刑事法评论,2022(2):102-121.
-
5张忆然.同意错误的被害人自我答责——基于错误类型的再区分[J].刑事法评论,2019(1):205-234. 被引量：1
-
6黄忠军.论假想防卫过当[J].刑事法评论,2019(1):175-204. 被引量：1
-
7张泽龙,张娜.亲密关系型诈骗行为入罪探析[J].中国检察官,2023(22):30-34.
-
8周振杰,章琦.帮助自杀行为的刑事法理分析——以张某、樊某、凡某故意杀人案为视角[J].河南警察学院学报,2021,30(2):21-28.
-
9施雄文.容许风险与主观归责路径研究——以网络中立帮助行为为例证[J].刑法论丛,2022(3):1-25. 被引量：1
-
10陈小彪,李瑞华.论被害人教义学视域下个人信息的刑法保护[J].刑法论丛,2020(1):188-216. 被引量：1
-
1LEO ZHANG.Crime and Punishmeni[J].China International Business,2008(10):44-44.
-
2赵秉志,袁彬,Wang Hao.ON THE CURRENT SITUATION AND TREND OF CHINA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICIES:MAKING THREE TYPICAL DEATH PENALTY CASES A BREAKTHROUGH POINT[J].China Legal Science,2013,1(2):4-24.
-
3Carolyn Hoyle,Michelle Miao.THINKING BEYOND DEATH PENALTY ABOLITIONIST REFORM:LESSONS FROM ABROAD AND THE OPTIONS FOR CHINA[J].China Legal Science,2014,2(2):121-140. 被引量：1
-
4Wang Fan is Director of the Institute of International Studies, China Foreign Affairs University..China-U.S. Relations:Harmony without Conformity[J].China International Studies,2007,27(1):145-148.
-
5洪浩.刑事诉讼安全价值与自由价值的统筹实现[J].中国审判,2012(4):38-40.
-
6Facts About Macao[J].China Population Today,1999,16(6):14-14.
-
7Photographed by WU Jianghua[J].China's Ethnic Groups,2016,14(1). 被引量：1
-
8杨正万.美国死刑案件中的被害人陈述[J].人民司法,2002(2):69-71. 被引量：3
-
9Lu Hongwei.CPAFFC Delegation Led by President Chen Haosu Visits Austria and Germany[J].Voice of Friendship,2007(1):14-17.
-
10TIAN Sheng-bin.Protecting the procedural rights of victim[J].US-China Law Review,2008,5(1):32-38.
