摘要
The new civil procedure law( 2012) of the PRC provides the discontinue procedure and it needs to enrich the contents of this system. There is a substantial divergence in the theories and practice of who could initiate this action. This divergence is affecting the function of this system. To comprehend this question,we should first judge whether the third party has gained sufficient procedural safeguard and has other institute relief. So if the third party should join the first trial as the third party without independent claim right,and he did not joined the procedure,then he could initiate the discontinue action. Of course if he could get remedy by the new trial procedure,then he could not enjoy the plaintiff competence of the discontinue.
2012年新民事诉讼法规定了第三人撤销之诉,其具体内容还需进一步充实。目前关于何者可以作为第三人撤销诉讼的原告,理论上和实践中存在非常大的分歧,影响了该制度功能的发挥。理解此问题必须以第三人是否与原诉讼程序中获得了程序保障及其有无其他的救济途径获得救济为判断标准。故一般情况下,未参加原审程序的、应以无独立请求权第三人身份参加诉讼的第三人可以具有该类诉讼的原告适格。同时,如果其可以再审途径获得救济,则不具有第三人撤销诉讼的原告适格。
