期刊文献+

美国国家利益观的演进

The Evolving of American National Interest View
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国国家利益观一贯在两个极端之间摆动:一端强调个人道德,另一端则强调现实主义。二战后的美国国家利益观充分证明了这一点:冷战时期的美国国家利益话语几乎与个人道德相绝缘;冷战结束导致的国家利益迷失和"9·11"袭击带来的巨大道德优势使得对个人道德的强调重新占据上风,随之而来的是新保守主义取得对现实主义的压倒性优势;但最近的趋势却是对国家利益的现实主义理解开始重新主导美国政治争论。在这一钟摆过程中,美国国家利益观发生了很大变化,即使是现实主义的国家利益观也或多或少地染上了道德论的印记。这对2008年大选后的美国外交政策走向或许具有某种重要的参考意义。 American national interest view has always swayed between two extremists:one emphasizing the individual morality,and the other emphasizing realism.The evolving history of American national interest view shows that:during the cold war period,it is almost insulated with individual morality;with puzzled national interest view after the end of cold war and the moral advantages resulted from the 9/11 terrorism attack,the realistic view of national interest is overwhelmed by the neoconservative one that emphasizes the importance of individual morality;however,the current trend seems to be that the realistic view is winning the battle once again.It is important to note that,in this process,American national interest view has been changed to a great extent and even the realistic view of national interest is imprinted by individual morality.This development has important implications for American foreign policy after the 2008 Presidential election.
作者 潘亚玲
出处 《美国问题研究》 CSSCI 2009年第1期97-112,222,225,共18页 Fudan American Review
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2005年度重大研究项目"国际安全和美国"(项目编号:05JJDGJW037)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1潘亚玲,张春.战争的演变:从寻求生存必需到维护生存质量[J].国际论坛,2002,4(4):14-21. 被引量:13
  • 2时殷弘.当今世界的反全球化力量[J].太平洋学报,2001,9(3):16-22. 被引量:22
  • 3.《文化的民族性和世界性》[N].《光明日报》,2002年12月24日.
  • 4Charles R Beitz, "Human Rights as a Common Concern",American Plitical Science Review, Vol.95, No.2,June 2001. p.269.
  • 5Dick Bell and Micheal Renner, "A New Marshall Plan? Advancing Human Security and Controlling Terrorism', Worldwatch Institute, 9 October 2001 .http ://www. worldwatch.org/aIters/011009, html.
  • 6Carl Kaysen, "Is War Obsolete? A Review Essay", in Sean M Lynn - Johns ed., The Cold War and After: Prospects for Peace,Cambridge. Mass. : The MIT Press, 1991,p.91.
  • 7John Onne, "The Utility d Force in World d Scarcity',International Security. Vo1.22o No.3. Winter 1997/1998.pp.138- 167.
  • 8Simon Dalby, "Geopolitical Change and Contemporary Security Studies: Contextualizing the Human Security Agenda", Working Paper, No.30, Institute of International Relations of The University of British Columbia,April 2000. http://www.iir.ubc. ca/pdffiles/webwp30. pdf.
  • 9United Nations Development programme, National Human Development Report 2001, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, p.15.
  • 10United Nations Development Programme,Human Development Report 1994, New York: Oxford University Press, 1994, pp.22 - 24.p.23.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部