期刊文献+

Size structure of urban agglomerations in China:rationality evaluation,patterns, and implications

Size structure of urban agglomerations in China:rationality evaluation,patterns, and implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper establishes a diagnostic model for assessing the rationality of size structure of urban agglomerations(UAs) in China. The model is designed to determine from a three-dimensional index including size distribution index(SDI), size compactness index(SCI), and size efficiency index(SEI). The spatio-temporal pattern of size structure involving the studied 19 UAs and its implications are explored. The results indicate that size structure of China's UAs advanced from a low rationality development stage to a moderate rationality development stage in 1995-2015.Among them, the SDI and SEI were reasonably high, and the SCI was relatively low. Spatially, the high rationality UAs were distributed across eastern China, while the low rationality UAs were located in western China. UAs with positive size structure possessed typically a dual-or multicenter urban structure, while UAs with negative size structure usually presented as a single-center structure. The evolutionary trajectories of rationality of size structure of UAs can be summarized as four different stages. Our findings suggest that, in addition to consolidating the status of national-level UAs, the development of regional-level UAs should be promoted. Also, the fostering focus and direction should be oriented toward an UA with dual-or multicenter spatial structure. This paper establishes a diagnostic model for assessing the rationality of size structure of urban agglomerations(UAs) in China. The model is designed to determine from a three-dimensional index including size distribution index(SDI), size compactness index(SCI), and size efficiency index(SEI). The spatio-temporal pattern of size structure involving the studied 19 UAs and its implications are explored. The results indicate that size structure of China's UAs advanced from a low rationality development stage to a moderate rationality development stage in 1995-2015.Among them, the SDI and SEI were reasonably high, and the SCI was relatively low. Spatially, the high rationality UAs were distributed across eastern China, while the low rationality UAs were located in western China. UAs with positive size structure possessed typically a dual-or multicenter urban structure, while UAs with negative size structure usually presented as a single-center structure. The evolutionary trajectories of rationality of size structure of UAs can be summarized as four different stages. Our findings suggest that, in addition to consolidating the status of national-level UAs, the development of regional-level UAs should be promoted. Also, the fostering focus and direction should be oriented toward an UA with dual-or multicenter spatial structure.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment》 2018年第4期329-342,共14页 中国人口·资源与环境(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China [Grant number:17CJY015] the Stragegic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [Grant number:XDA19040501] the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities[Grant number:2018RW01] Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Grant number:9184035]
关键词 SIZE structure RATIONALITY evaluation SIZE distribution INDEX SIZE COMPACTNESS INDEX SIZE efficiency INDEX urban AGGLOMERATION China Size structure rationality evaluation size distribution index size compactness index size efficiency index urban agglomeration China
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

共引文献307

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部