古籍点校成果著作权探析

Discussion on the Copyright of Ancient Books Published Results

当前理论界以及实务界对古籍点校成果是否构成作品以及是否应当受到著作权法保护的争议都非常大,本文从实务界以及理论界对于古籍点校成果著作权归属的不同观点入手,首先厘清古籍点校与古籍重建的不同,其次探究古籍点校成果是否应该受到著作权法的保护。本文作者从独创性原理入手,认为古籍点校成果不构成作品,不应该受到著作权法的保护。更进一步地从事实不受著作权法保护规则、混合原则、额头流汗规则三个方面,进一步探讨古籍点校的成果不应该受到著作权法的保护。

There is a law disputes that is ancient books published results whether should be protected.The author thinks that ancient books published results does not constitute a work, it should not be subject to copyright law from the principle of originality. And further explore ancient books published results should not be subject to copyright law from the fact that no copyright protection rules, the right method of mixed principle, sweat three aspects of protection rules.