期刊文献+

商业银行资源配置中的行业评价方法比较

The Comparison of Industry Evaluation Methods in the Credit Resource Allocation of Commercial Banks
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文重点比较了因子分析法和熵权法在商业银行行业评价中的运用,通过这两种方法来对制造业下属 30 个子行业进行评价分析,得到各个子行业的综合得分和排名。研究发现,因子分析法和熵权法尽管在原理上不尽相同,但是最后的评价结果却显现出很好的一致性。在商业银行信贷资源行业配置的过程中,因子分析法和熵权法具有广阔的应用前景,两者都能够对行业做出客观的评价。因子分析法可以对所选评价指标进行归类,熵权法可以对行业的优劣差异做出更加精确的判断,两者能够起到相互佐证的作用。 This paper focuses on the comparison of the factor analysis method and entropy-weight method applied in the industry evaluation of commercial banks. With the two methods, the paper evaluates and analyses the 30 sub-industry of manufacturing sector and gains the composite scores and ranking of the various sub-sectors. We find that the factor analysis method and entropy-weight method are not the same in principle, but the final results of the evaluation have revealed a good consistency. The factor analysis method and entropy-weight method have broad application prospects in the credit resource allocation of commercial banks and they both can make an objective evaluation of the industry. The factor analysis method can classify the selected evaluation indicators and the entropy-weight method can make more accurate judgments of the pros and cons of the industry. They both can play the roles of mutual corroboration.
作者 胡召平
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期53-59,共7页 Finance Forum
关键词 商业银行 信贷资源配置 行业评价 因子分析法 熵权法 commercial bank credit resource allocation industry evaluation factor analysis method entropy-weight method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 2Yang, J.P. & Qiu, W.H..A Measure of Risk and a Decision-Making Model Based on Expected Utility and Entropy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 164(3): 792-799.
  • 3Willis, R,J, ,Inter-company Ccomparison Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights [J], Computers & Operations Research, 2000,27(10): 963-973.
  • 4Yuan, H,C,, Xiong, F.L. & Huai, X,Y, .A Method for Eestimating the Number of Hissen Neurons in Feed-forward Neural Networks Based on Information Eentropy[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2003, 40 (1): 57-64.
  • 5Shuiabi, E., Thomoson, V. & Bhuiyan, N, .Entropy as a Measure of Operational Flexibility [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 165 (3): 696-707.
  • 6Antoniou, I. et aL Analysis of Rresources Distribution in Economics Based on Entropy [J].Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 304 (3): 525-534.
  • 7Gill, J, ,An Entropy Measure of Uncertainty in Vote Choice [M]. Electoral Studies, in Press, Available Online in Jan. 20, 2005.
  • 8荣杰.从科学发展观视角探究信贷资源配置失衡问题[J].金融纵横,2008(12):27-30. 被引量:3
  • 9中国人民银行济南分行营业管理部课题组,董昕.金融危机背景下“保增长、调结构”的信贷资源配置研究——以山东省为例[J].金融发展研究,2009(9):63-66. 被引量:2
  • 10李正豪.产业政策刺激行业景气指数[J].通信世界,2010(13):11-12. 被引量:1

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部