期刊文献+

MRI与钼靶X线对乳腺癌术前瘤体体积及病理分型的评估价值 被引量:29

Evaluated Value of MRI and Mammography on Preoperative Tumor Volume and Pathological Types of Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)与钼靶X线对乳腺癌术前瘤体体积及病理分型的评估价值。方法选择医院2016年4月-2018年4月收治的乳腺癌患者120例,所有患者均经手术病理证实为乳腺癌。术前均接受乳腺MRI、钼靶X线检查,比较两种检查方式的检出率、瘤体体积及病理分型情况。结果 MRI在乳腺癌的检出率高于钼靶X线检查(P<0.05),对瘤体体积评估与病理结果的一致性高于钼靶X线检查(P<0.05),对于导管原位癌、浸润性小叶癌及粘液腺癌病理分型的符合率高于钼靶X线检查(P<0.05)。结论 MRI在术前乳腺癌的检出率高于钼靶X线,病例分型也较准确,对瘤体体积的评估与病理结果一致性较高。 Objective To explore the evaluated value of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI and mammography in the preoperative tumor volume and pathological types of breast cancer. Methods 120 cases of patients with breast cancer who were admitted to the hospital from April 2016 to April 2018 were selected. All patients were confirmed to be breast cancer by surgical pathology. All patients were given breast MRI and mammography before operation. The detection rate, tumor volume and pathological types of the two examination methods were compared. Results The detection rate of breast cancer by MRI was higher than that by mammography(P<0.05), and the consistency of tumor volume assessment and pathological results was higher than that of mammography(P<0.05), and the coincidence rates of pathological types of ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive lobular carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma were higher than those by mammography(P<0.05). Conclusion The detection rate of preoperative breast cancer by MRI is higher than that by mammography, and MRI has accurate pathological types, and has high consistency of tumor volume assessment and pathological results.
作者 韩明利 吕鹏威 杨雪 杨云卿 韩娜 HAN Ming-li;LV Peng-wei;YANG Xue(Department of Breast Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan Province,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2019年第4期72-74,101,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 乳腺癌 MRI 钼靶X线 瘤体体积 病理分型 Breast Cancer MRI Mammography Tumor Volume Pathological Types
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献132

  • 1史春颖,张立涛,陈颖.钼靶X线摄影和彩色多普勒超声对早期乳腺癌诊断价值的对比分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2005,39(6):531-533. 被引量:18
  • 2任永富,阎若元,沈友洪,唐丽娜,尚志红.超声和钼靶X线联合诊断乳腺肿瘤[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(1):58-61. 被引量:9
  • 3张思维,陈万青,孔灵芝,李光琳,赵平.中国部分市县2003年恶性肿瘤发病年度报告[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(7):494-507. 被引量:100
  • 4李俊杰,邵志敏.妊娠期乳腺癌的诊治进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(10):824-827. 被引量:12
  • 5Oscar Fern a ndez-Guinea,Alejandro Andicoechea, LuisOGonzalez, et al. Relationshipbetween morphologicalfeatures and kineticpatterns of enhancement ofthe dynam i cbrea s t magneticresonance imaging andclinicopathological andbiological factors in invasivebreast cancer [J]. BMC Cancer,2010,10(11): 8.
  • 6American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas ( BI-RADS atlas). Reston, VA : American College of Ra- diology ,2003,1-197.
  • 7Majidas S, Deparedes ES, Dohertry D, et al. Missed breast carcino- ma: pitfalls and pearls[J]. RadioGraphics,2003 ,23 :881-885.
  • 8Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, et al. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result : relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic facters [ J ]. Radiology, 2004,230:42-48.
  • 9Ziv E, Shepherd J, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer[ J]. J Nail Cancer Inst, 2003,95:556-558.
  • 10Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical fac- tors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model [ J ]. Ann In- tern Med ,2008,148:337-347.

共引文献272

同被引文献238

引证文献29

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部