期刊文献+

比较视野下的行政公益诉讼原告资格——世界的经验与中国的选择

The Plaintiff Qualification of Administrative Public Welfare Litigation from a Comparative View:Foreign Experience and China’s Choice
原文传递
导出
摘要 行政公益诉讼制度的主要目的在于维护社会公共利益。但是,无论在英美法系还是大陆法系,行政公益诉讼尚未成为一种独立的诉讼类型。这一制度在不同国家都经历了从无到有的发展过程。在这些不同国家的发展过程中,行政公益诉讼制度基本上是随着行政诉讼原告资格的不断变化而逐渐发展起来。因此,对各国行政公益诉讼制度原告资格的发展过程进行梳理和比较分析,对于我国构建行政公益诉讼制度,具有非常重要的借鉴意义。 The main purpose of the administrative public welfare litigation is to maintain public interests and rights.However,in terms of common law or civil law,public administrative lawsuits have not become an independent litigation type.This system has had a development process from scratch in different countries.In the development process in these countries,the administrative public welfare litigation system gradually develops along with the change of plaintiff qualification.Therefore,this paper makes a summary and comparative analysis of the development of plaintiff qualification,which is of great significance in establishing public welfare litigation in China.
作者 朱学磊 Zhu Xuelei
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《朝阳法律评论》 2014年第1期90-110,共21页 Chaoyang Law Review
关键词 行政公益诉讼 原告资格 世界经验 Administrative Public Welfare Litigation/Lawsuit Plaintiff Qualification Foreign Experience

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部