古典学派语境下的教唆犯地位研究

Studies on Situation of Abettor under the Condition of Classical Theory

古典学派关于教唆犯共犯从属性地位的结论,值得质疑。对相关理论的追溯及古典学派语境下教唆犯构成要件的解构表明,教唆者与被教唆者之间并不具有必然的共犯关系。同时,教唆犯的共犯性地位将直接导致被教唆者未着手实施犯罪、实施的是非所教唆犯罪等情况下犯罪认定及刑罚裁量上的牵强。认定教唆犯为具有构成性地位的独立犯,既是对古典学派共犯论体系的重构,也是一种完善。

The conclusion of classical theory that abettor is subordinated or independent of principal is doubtable.The tracing to theories related and the studies to constitutive requirements show that the abettor is not necessarily the accomplice of the abetted.The conclusion that the abettor is accomplice will lead to the difficulties of confirming the name of crime and adjudicating of punishment under situations such as the abetted commits no crime or other crimes.To recognize abetting crime as independent crime with constitutive position is not only the reconstruction of classical accomplice system,but also a kind of completion.