构成要件论的发展与三阶层犯罪构成体系的当代异化

On The Development of the Constitutive Elements Theory and Today Changing of Three-Layer System of Elements of Crimes

德日刑法三阶层体系中的构成要件论发端于贝林的"行为类型说",但"行为类型说"不能得到认同;构成要件论实质化及主观化的合理结局只能是"违法有责类型说"。在当代德日刑法中,坚持违法有责的构成要件论,则必然导致传统三阶层犯罪构成体系的具体构造发生种种异化。由此启示我们,德日刑法的三阶层体系并不宜直接照搬,完善我国犯罪构成体系的正确方向应当是在四要件体系框架下谋求客观违法要件与主观责任要件的区分。

The constitutive elements theory comes from the action type theory of Beling.However,this theory can't be ratified.The reasonable finale of developing of the constitutive elements theory is'illegal and duty type theory'.The form of there orders System of Constitution of crime will come in to some changing when we believe in the illegal and duty type theory.Accordingly,we affirm that the there orders System of Constitution of crime can't be used in China,and the true direction of system of elements of crimes'improvement in China is separated the elements of objective illegitimacy from the elements of subjective duty.