摘要
自"学习型组织"、"学习型城市"和"学习型社会"进入教育词汇,"终身学习"逐渐成为超国家的政策中心字眼,然而在政策话语中,却存在把终身学习视为标准真理的虚夸言辞,它遮蔽了终身学习的建构特性。为此,在"价值"、"旨向"、"动力"和"组织"的框架下,对终身学习进行多向度解析,指出:终身学习处于价值语境下的"善"与"非善"、旨向视野下的"人力资本"与"社会资本"、动力境域下的"个人需求"与"社会驱动"、组织背景下的"工具理性"与"价值理性"的张力之中,不存在统一和静止的真理标准。
Since terms like ' the learning organization ' , ' the learning city ' and ' the learning society ' were introduced into education vocabulary, lifelong learning has gradually become a central, supranational word in the policy arena, but there is a tendency to exaggerate ' lifelong learning ' as the standard of truth, as a rhetorical word, which hides the fact that lifelong learning is constructed. Therefore, from the perspectives of ' value ' , ' purport ' , ' agent ' and ' organization ' , this paper analyzed lifelong learning from multi-dimensions and proposed that there exists no uniform or static universal criterion: lifelong learning can be distinguished into ' good value ' and ' not good value ' , into ' human capital purport ' and ' social capital purport ' , into 'personal demand' and 'social drive' in terms of agent, into ' instrumental rationality ' and ' value judgment rationality ' in terms of organization.
出处
《中国人民大学教育学刊》
2012年第4期120-133,共14页
Renmin University of China Education Journal
基金
全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部重点课题<西方学习型社会创建的历史背景与实践内涵研究>(项目编号:DKA120305)
关键词
终身学习
价值
旨向
动力
组织
lifelong learning
value
purport
agent
organization