期刊文献+

试论适用无过错责任原则的侵权案件中的证明责任分配

On Distribution of the Burden of Proof in the Tort Cases Applying No-Fault Liability Principle
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期以来,适用无过错责任原则的侵权案件中的证明责任如何分配众说纷纭。但是,学界一直尚未有从证明责任基本理论角度专门探讨该问题的文章。笔者试从基本理论出发探讨了适用无过错责任原则的侵权案件中的证明责任的分配原则,据此对我国相关立法规定提出了质疑和合理化建议,深入探求了因果关系推定时的证明责任归属,主张高度危险作业致人损害的侵权诉讼以及饲养动物致人损害的侵权诉讼中对因果关系不存在的证明责任应当由加害人承担。 There are wide divided opinions about distribution of the burden of proof in the tort cases applying no-fault liability principle for a long time.However,there isn't any thesis specially investigating it based on elementary theory of the burden of proof.The author tried to make re- search on the principle of distribution of the burden of proof in the tort ca- ses applying no-fault liability principle based on the elementary theory, and according to the above,proposed the doubt and the rationalization proposal to the legislation of our country.It thoroughly sought the distri- bution of the burden of proof when the causal relation theory applied.It also advocated the party causing an injury should undertake the burden of proof to certify the causal relationship not existing in the right infringe- ment lawsuit for injured human by the highly dangerous work as well as the raising animal.
作者 王鸿雁
出处 《山东大学法律评论》 2007年第1期105-116,共12页 Shandong University Law Review
关键词 无过错责任 证明责任分配 证明责任倒置 因果关系 推定 liability without fault distribution of the burden of proof conversion of burden proof the causal relation theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

  • 1[日]兼子一著 竹下守夫 自绿铉译.《民事诉讼法》[M].法律出版社,1995年版.第15页.
  • 2[日]村上博己.《证明责任的研究》(新版),第44页.
  • 3《民主法制画报》,1998年11月23日.
  • 4高志强..《举证责任倒置实务研究》,人民法院报网上文章..,,2001年8月24日..

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部