期刊文献+

狂躁型和麻痹型狂犬病患者神经病理机制的差异

Difference in neuropathogenetic mechanisms in human furious and paralytic rabies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Whereas paralysis is the hallmark for paralytic rabies, the precise pathological basis of paralysis is not known. It is unclear whether weakness results from involvement of anterior horn cells or of motor nerve fibers. There is also no conclusive data on the cause of the neuropathic pain which occurs at the bitten region, although it has been presumed to be related to sensory ganglionopathy. In this study, six laboratory-proven rabies patients (three paralytic and three furious) were assessed clinically and electrophysiologically. Our data suggests th at peripheral nerve dysfunction, most likely demyelination, contributes to the weakness in paralytic rabies. In furious rabies, progressive focal denervation, starting at the bitten segment, was evident even in the absence of demonstrable weakness and the electrophysiologic study suggested anterior horn cell dysfunctio n. In two paralytic and one furious rabies patients who had severe paresthesias as a prodrome, electrophysiologic studies suggested dorsal root ganglionopathy. Postmortem studies in two paralytic and one furious rabies patients, who had local neuropathic pain, showed severe dorsal root ganglionitis. Intense inflammation of the spinal nerve roots was observed more in paralytic rabies patients. Inflammation was mainly noted in the spinal cord segment corresponding to the bite in all cases; however, central chromatolysis of the anterior horn cells could be demonstrated only in furious rabies patient. We conclude that differential sites of neural involvement and possibly different neuropathogenetic mechanisms may explain the clinical diversity in human rabies. Whereas paralysis is the hallmark for paralytic rabies, the precise pathological basis of paralysis is not known. It is unclear whether weakness results from involvement of anterior horn cells or of motor nerve fibers. There is also no conclusive data on the cause of the neuropathic pain which occurs at the bitten region, although it has been presumed to be related to sensory ganglionopathy. In this study, six laboratory-proven rabies patients (three paralytic and three furious) were assessed clinically and electrophysiologically. Our data suggests th at peripheral nerve dysfunction, most likely demyelination, contributes to the weakness in paralytic rabies. In furious rabies, progressive focal denervation, starting at the bitten segment, was evident even in the absence of demonstrable weakness and the electrophysiologic study suggested anterior horn cell dysfunctio n. In two paralytic and one furious rabies patients who had severe paresthesias as a prodrome, electrophysiologic studies suggested dorsal root ganglionopathy. Postmortem studies in two paralytic and one furious rabies patients, who had local neuropathic pain, showed severe dorsal root ganglionitis. Intense inflammation of the spinal nerve roots was observed more in paralytic rabies patients. Inflammation was mainly noted in the spinal cord segment corresponding to the bite in all cases; however, central chromatolysis of the anterior horn cells could be demonstrated only in furious rabies patient. We conclude that differential sites of neural involvement and possibly different neuropathogenetic mechanisms may explain the clinical diversity in human rabies.
机构地区 Neurology Division
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册)》 2006年第3期12-12,共1页 Digest of the World Core Medical Journals:Clinical Neurology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部