期刊文献+

正常阴道分娩后肛门括约肌的定量肌电图评价

Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence in women is thought to be associated with sphi nc ter laceration or pudendal nerve damage. A prolonged pudendal nerve terminal mot or latency is evidence of profound nerve damage, but pudendal nerve terminal mot or latency can be normal even when nerve injury has been sustained. We performed quantitative electromyography (EMG) to compare multiple motor unit action poten tial parameters between recently postpartum women and nulliparous women. METHODS : Standardized examinations were prospectively performed on 2 groups: 1) healthy nulliparous women without pelvic floor disorders (n=28) and 2) asymptomatic wom en who were postpartum following vaginal delivery of their first child (n = 23). The examinations included pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements, e ndoanal ultrasonography, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, sacral reflexes, and concentric needle EMG using multiple motor unit action potential analysis. RESULTS: A mean of 11.5 (standard deviation [SD] 1.1) weeks had elapsed since fi rst vaginal deliveries in the postpartum group. The mean fetal weight at deliver y was 3,495 (SD 458) grams. There were no sphincter defects seen by ultrasonogra phy. Compared with the nulliparous women, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and sacral reflexes (clitoral-anal reflex, urethral-anal reflex) were not incr eased in the postpartum group. Each of the quantitative parameters (duration, am plitude, area, turns, and phases), measured from motor unit action potentials in the postpartum group, were larger than in the nulliparous group (P ≤.004, nest ed analysis of variance [ANOVA]). CONCLUSION: Quantitative EMG using multiple mo tor unit action potential analysis can detect the presence after vaginal childbi rth of subtle nerve injury not demonstrable by pudendal nerve terminal motor lat ency. Even asymptomatic women show evidence of pelvic floor nerve injury after u ncomplicated deliveries. OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence in women is thought to be associated with sphi nc ter laceration or pudendal nerve damage. A prolonged pudendal nerve terminal mot or latency is evidence of profound nerve damage, but pudendal nerve terminal mot or latency can be normal even when nerve injury has been sustained. We performed quantitative electromyography (EMG) to compare multiple motor unit action poten tial parameters between recently postpartum women and nulliparous women. METHODS : Standardized examinations were prospectively performed on 2 groups: 1) healthy nulliparous women without pelvic floor disorders (n=28) and 2) asymptomatic wom en who were postpartum following vaginal delivery of their first child (n = 23). The examinations included pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements, e ndoanal ultrasonography, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, sacral reflexes, and concentric needle EMG using multiple motor unit action potential analysis. RESULTS: A mean of 11.5 (standard deviation [SD] 1.1) weeks had elapsed since fi rst vaginal deliveries in the postpartum group. The mean fetal weight at deliver y was 3,495 (SD 458) grams. There were no sphincter defects seen by ultrasonogra phy. Compared with the nulliparous women, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and sacral reflexes (clitoral-anal reflex, urethral-anal reflex) were not incr eased in the postpartum group. Each of the quantitative parameters (duration, am plitude, area, turns, and phases), measured from motor unit action potentials in the postpartum group, were larger than in the nulliparous group (P ≤.004, nest ed analysis of variance [ANOVA]). CONCLUSION: Quantitative EMG using multiple mo tor unit action potential analysis can detect the presence after vaginal childbi rth of subtle nerve injury not demonstrable by pudendal nerve terminal motor lat ency. Even asymptomatic women show evidence of pelvic floor nerve injury after u ncomplicated deliveries.
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 2005年第9期40-41,共2页 Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部