期刊文献+

会阴、阴道和宫颈裂伤的人种/民族差异

Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: To determine if variation exists between ethnicities for risk of perineal, vaginal, and cervical laceration at vaginal delivery. Study design: Retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women who underwent vaginal delivery of a vertex presentation. Predictor variable was ethnicity with outcome variables cervical, vaginal, and second- , third- , or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to control for confounders. Results: Of the 17,216 who met criteria, Filipino (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.64- 2.25) and Chinese (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33- 1.92) women were at greatest risk for third-and fourth-degree laceration. Only Filipino (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.10- 1.57) and other Asian (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.08- 1.41) women were at slightly increased risk of vaginal laceration. No differences were seen for cervical laceration. Conclusion: Different ethnicities are at widely varying risk of perineal laceration, but little difference exists for vaginal or cervical lacerations. Research into the mechanisms behind this should investigate differences in perineal anatomy. Objective: To determine if variation exists between ethnicities for risk of perineal, vaginal, and cervical laceration at vaginal delivery. Study design: Retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women who underwent vaginal delivery of a vertex presentation. Predictor variable was ethnicity with outcome variables cervical, vaginal, and second- , third- , or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to control for confounders. Results: Of the 17,216 who met criteria, Filipino (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.64- 2.25) and Chinese (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33- 1.92) women were at greatest risk for third-and fourth-degree laceration. Only Filipino (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.10- 1.57) and other Asian (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.08- 1.41) women were at slightly increased risk of vaginal laceration. No differences were seen for cervical laceration. Conclusion: Different ethnicities are at widely varying risk of perineal laceration, but little difference exists for vaginal or cervical lacerations. Research into the mechanisms behind this should investigate differences in perineal anatomy.
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 2005年第12期10-11,共2页 Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部