期刊文献+

测量眼压的一次性装置:评估其准确性的临床研究

Disposable devices for measuring intraocular pressure: A clinical study to assess their accuracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Aims: We conducted a study to compare the accuracy of two commercially available disposable tonometry devices (the acrylic biprism, TonosafeTM and the silicone shield, TonoshieldTM)with the standard Goldmann ap planation ton-ometer (GAT). Methods: A total of 80 eyes of 40 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (40 eyes) had the intraocular pressure IOP measured using GAT and the acrylic biprism.(TonosafeTM), while Group B(40 eyes) had IOP measured using GAT and the disposable silicone shield (TonoshieldTM). IOP was measured using the GAT both before and after the disposable device and average of the two standard Goldmann readings was comparedwith the IOPmeasured using the disposable devices. Results: The mean difference in IOP in Group A was 0.29 mmHg (SD 0.54) (P=0.0018) while in Group B the mean difference in IOP was 2.09 mmHg (SD 1.23) (P < 0.0001). The Altman-Bland method was used to assess the agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. This shows a positive bias of 0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11- 0.46) when using the disposable acrylic biprism and a positive bias of 2.09 (95% CI 1.69- 2.48) with the silicone shield. Conclusion: The IOP recorded using the disposable acrylic biprism (TonosafeTM) was in close agreement with the standard GAT. However, IOP readings obtained with the silicone shield (TonoshieldTM) tend to be higher than with the standard GAT. These facts should be kept in mind when recording IOP in clinical situations. Aims: We conducted a study to compare the accuracy of two commercially available disposable tonometry devices (the acrylic biprism, TonosafeTM and the silicone shield, TonoshieldTM)with the standard Goldmann ap planation ton-ometer (GAT). Methods: A total of 80 eyes of 40 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (40 eyes) had the intraocular pressure IOP measured using GAT and the acrylic biprism.(TonosafeTM), while Group B(40 eyes) had IOP measured using GAT and the disposable silicone shield (TonoshieldTM). IOP was measured using the GAT both before and after the disposable device and average of the two standard Goldmann readings was comparedwith the IOPmeasured using the disposable devices. Results: The mean difference in IOP in Group A was 0.29 mmHg (SD 0.54) (P=0.0018) while in Group B the mean difference in IOP was 2.09 mmHg (SD 1.23) (P < 0.0001). The Altman-Bland method was used to assess the agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. This shows a positive bias of 0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11- 0.46) when using the disposable acrylic biprism and a positive bias of 2.09 (95% CI 1.69- 2.48) with the silicone shield. Conclusion: The IOP recorded using the disposable acrylic biprism (TonosafeTM) was in close agreement with the standard GAT. However, IOP readings obtained with the silicone shield (TonoshieldTM) tend to be higher than with the standard GAT. These facts should be kept in mind when recording IOP in clinical situations.
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(眼科学分册)》 2005年第12期44-44,共1页 Digest of the World Core Medical Journals:Ophthalmology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部