期刊文献+

避免不适当的植入心脏复律除颤器:快速性心律失常检出方法的前瞻性随机研究结果

Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results of a prospective, randomized study of tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The purpose of this randomized study was to investigate the performance of single-and dual-chamber tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms. A proposed benefit of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators(ICDs)is improved specificity of tachyarrhythmia detection. All ICD candidates received a dual-chamber ICD and were randomized to programmed single-or dual-chamber detection. Of 60 patients(47 male, age 58±14 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30%), 29 had single-chamber and 31 had dual-chamber settings. The detection results were corrected for multiple episodes within a patient with the generalized estimating equations method. A total of 653 spontaneous arrhythmia episodes(39 patients)were classified by the investigators; 391 episodes were ventricular tachyarrhythmia(32 patients). All episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were appropriately detected in both settings. In 25 patients, 262 episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmias were recorded. Detection was inappropriate for 109 atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes(42%, 18 patients). Rejection of atrial tachyarrhythmias was not significantly different between both groups(p=0.55). Episodes of atrial flutter/tachycardia were significantly more misclassified(p=0.001). Overall, no significant difference in tachyarrhythmia detection(atrial and ventricular)between both settings was demonstrated(p=0.77). The applied detection criteria in dual-chamber devices do not offer benefits in the rejection of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Discrimination of atrial tachyarrhythmias with a stable atrioventricular relationship remains a challenge. The purpose of this randomized study was to investigate the performance of single-and dual-chamber tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms. A proposed benefit of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators(ICDs)is improved specificity of tachyarrhythmia detection. All ICD candidates received a dual-chamber ICD and were randomized to programmed single-or dual-chamber detection. Of 60 patients(47 male, age 58±14 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30%), 29 had single-chamber and 31 had dual-chamber settings. The detection results were corrected for multiple episodes within a patient with the generalized estimating equations method. A total of 653 spontaneous arrhythmia episodes(39 patients)were classified by the investigators; 391 episodes were ventricular tachyarrhythmia(32 patients). All episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were appropriately detected in both settings. In 25 patients, 262 episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmias were recorded. Detection was inappropriate for 109 atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes(42%, 18 patients). Rejection of atrial tachyarrhythmias was not significantly different between both groups(p=0.55). Episodes of atrial flutter/tachycardia were significantly more misclassified(p=0.001). Overall, no significant difference in tachyarrhythmia detection(atrial and ventricular)between both settings was demonstrated(p=0.77). The applied detection criteria in dual-chamber devices do not offer benefits in the rejection of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Discrimination of atrial tachyarrhythmias with a stable atrioventricular relationship remains a challenge.
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部