期刊文献+

经导管治疗伴有卵圆孔未闭的房间隔动脉瘤高危患者以预防复发性反常栓塞 被引量:1

Transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm associated with patent foramen ovale for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism in high-risk patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm(ASA) associated with patent foramen ovale(PFO). Patients with both ASA and PFO are at high risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism. The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of 141 patients with ASA +PFO and< 1 paradoxical embolic event undergoing transcatheter treatment were compared with 220 patients with PFO alone. Device success(ASA +PFO, 99.3%; PFO alone, 99.5%; p=0.75) and procedural complications(ASA +PFO, 0.7%; PFO alone, 3.2%; p=0.12) were similar in both groups. Maximal atrial septal excursion in patients with ASA +PFO decreased from 16±4 mm before to 4±3 mm after the intervention(p< 0.0001). At 6 months follow-up, right-to-left shunt was abolished in 120(86%) patients with ASA +PFO, compared to 187(85%) patients with PFO alone(p=0.80). Freedom from recurrent transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral embolism at 4 years was 95%(ASA+PFO) and 94%(PFO alone, p=0.70), respectively. A residual right-to-left shunt after the intervention was the only predictor for recurrence(hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 36.9, p< 0.03) in patients with ASA +PFO. Transcatheter treatment of ASA +PFO is safe and effective in patients with paradoxical embolism. The procedure effectively abolishes right-to-left shunt and decreases atrial septal mobility. Long-term prevention of recurrent events appears favorable when compared to patients with PFO alone. This study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm(ASA) associated with patent foramen ovale(PFO). Patients with both ASA and PFO are at high risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism. The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of 141 patients with ASA +PFO and< 1 paradoxical embolic event undergoing transcatheter treatment were compared with 220 patients with PFO alone. Device success(ASA +PFO, 99.3%; PFO alone, 99.5%; p=0.75) and procedural complications(ASA +PFO, 0.7%; PFO alone, 3.2%; p=0.12) were similar in both groups. Maximal atrial septal excursion in patients with ASA +PFO decreased from 16±4 mm before to 4±3 mm after the intervention(p< 0.0001). At 6 months follow-up, right-to-left shunt was abolished in 120(86%) patients with ASA +PFO, compared to 187(85%) patients with PFO alone(p=0.80). Freedom from recurrent transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral embolism at 4 years was 95%(ASA+PFO) and 94%(PFO alone, p=0.70), respectively. A residual right-to-left shunt after the intervention was the only predictor for recurrence(hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 36.9, p< 0.03) in patients with ASA +PFO. Transcatheter treatment of ASA +PFO is safe and effective in patients with paradoxical embolism. The procedure effectively abolishes right-to-left shunt and decreases atrial septal mobility. Long-term prevention of recurrent events appears favorable when compared to patients with PFO alone.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献9

  • 1Dr. P.A. Ringleb,W. Hacke. Stent oder Operation bei symptomatischer Karotisstenose[J] 2007,Der Nervenarzt(10):1130~1137
  • 2Krassen Nedeltchev,Urs Fischer,Marcel Arnold,Liliane Kappeler,Heinrich P. Mattle MD. Low awareness of transient ischemic attacks and risk factors of stroke in a Swiss urban community[J] 2007,Journal of Neurology(2):179~184
  • 3Muge Gunalp MD,Enver Atalar MD,Figen Coskun MD,Arda Yilmaz MD,Serdar Aksoyek,Nalan Metin Aksu MD,Bulent Sivri. Holter monitoring for 24 hours in patients with thromboembolic stroke and sinus rhythm diagnosed in the emergency department[J] 2006,Advances in Therapy(6):854~860
  • 4St. Paolucci M.D.,C. Gandolfo M.D.,L. Provinciali M.D.,R. Torta M.D.,V. Toso M.D.. The Italian multicenter observational study on post–stroke depression (DESTRO)[J] 2006,Journal of Neurology(5):556~562
  • 5Peter D. Schellinger MD, PhD,Jochen B. Fiebach. Intracranial hemorrhage[J] 2004,Neurocritical Care(1):31~45
  • 6Enrico Righetti,Maria Grazia Celani,Teresa Anna Cantisani,Roberto Sterzi,Gudrun Boysen,Stefano Ricci. Glycerol for acute stroke: a Cochrane systematic review[J] 2002,Journal of Neurology(4):445~451
  • 7M. Camerlingo,L. Casto,B. Censori,B. Ferraro,G. Gazzaniga,T. Partziguian,M. Signore,C. Panagia,A. Fascendini,B. M. Cesana,A. Mamoli. Experience with a questionnaire administered by emergency medical service for pre-hospital identification of patients with acute stroke[J] 2001,Neurological Sciences(5):357~361
  • 8J. Montaner,C. Vidal,C. Molina,J. Alvarez-Sabín. Selecting the target and the message for a stroke public education campaign: A local survey conducted by neurologists[J] 2001,European Journal of Epidemiology(6):581~586
  • 9A. Ramnemark,L. Nyberg,B. Borssén,T. Olsson,Y. Gustafson. Fractures after Stroke[J] 1998,Osteoporosis International(1):92~95

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部