高血压脑出血颅内血肿微创穿刺软通道技术与硬通道技术临床应用比较

Comparison of Clinical Application of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage with Intracranial Hematoma Puncture Minimally Invasive Technique of Soft and Hard Channel Technology

目的:比较高血压脑出血颅内血肿微创穿刺软通道技术与硬通道技术的临床疗效。方法:纳入高血压性脑出血患者72例,随机分为两组,硬通道组(37例)行硬通道微创穿刺技术治疗,软通道组(36例)行软通道微创穿刺技术治疗。对比治疗效果。结果:软通道组3个月日常生活能力优于硬通道组,并发症亦较硬通道组低。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:因软管可以调整方向,血肿清除时间短,脑组织受压时间短,患者肢体功能恢复快;因软管不影响病人的体位改变,肺部感染,褥疮发生率低。

Abjective:To compare the hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage with intracranial hematoma puncture minimally invasive soft-channel technology and the clinical effect of hard-channel technology.Methods:Patients included in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage,72 cases were randomly divided into two groups,hard-channel group(37 patients) hard tunnel minimally invasive treatment of puncture,the soft-channel group(36 patients) in treatment of soft-channel minimally invasive puncture.Contrast therapy.Results:The soft channel group 3 months of daily living is better than hard-channel group,complications were lower channel is also hard.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The hose can be adjusted due to the direction of hematoma evacuation time is short,brain tissue compression time is short,quick recovery in patients with limb function;because hose does not affect the patient's body position changes,lung infection,a lower incidence of pressure ulcers.