循症护理在急性细菌性痢疾中的效果观察

The observation of effect of evidence-based nursing in the patients with acute bacillary dysentery

目的:探讨循证护理模式在急性细菌性痢疾患者中的护理效果,以为急性细菌性痢疾的护理方式的选择提供依据。方法:选取2007年9月-2009年5月于我院进行治疗的78例急性细菌性痢疾患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组(常规护理组)38例和观察组(循证护理组)40例,分别采用不同的护理模式进行护理,后将两组患者的治疗效果、体温、脉搏、粪便白细胞计数及血清IgG、IgA、IgM进行检测,并将患者的满意率进行统计,后将结果进行比较。结果:经研究比较发现,观察组的总有效率明显高于对照组,体温也低于对照组,脉搏慢于对照组,粪便白细胞计数也少于对照组,同时观察组的IgG、IgA、IgM也低于对照组,患者满意率也高于对照组,P均<0.05,差异均有统计学意义。结论:在急性细菌性痢疾的护理中采用循证护理的模式,效果明显优于常规护理模式,值得进一步研究及探讨。

Objective:To study the effect of evidence-based nursing in the patients with acute bacillary dysentery,in order to provide evidence for the choice of nursing mode.Methods:78 cases patients with acute bacillary dysentery in our hospital from September 2007 to May 2009 were selected as research object,and were divided control group(routine nursing group) 38 cases and observation group(evidence-based nursing group)40 cases.All the patients were taken care of with different nursing.Then the treatment effect,body temperature,pulse,leukocyte count of feces,IgG,IgA,IgM of serum were detection,and the satisfaction rate of patients were surveyed.Then the results were compared.Results:We found that the treatment effect of observation group were better than that of control group,and body temperature was lower than that of control group,leukocyte count of feces was less than that of control group,IgG,IgA,IgM levels of serum were lower than that of control group,satisfaction rate of patients were higher,P<0.05,there were significant differences.Conclusion:The effect of evidence-based nursing in the patients with acute bacillary dysentery is better than that of routine nursing,and it is worthy of further studying and used.