期刊文献+

美国在阿富汗反恐军事行动的合法性问题探析 被引量:4

On Legality of U.S. Anti-Terrorist Military Action in Afghanistan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “9.1 1”事件后 ,美国领导的在阿富汗的反恐军事行动 ,在国际法上找不到依据。美国以“自卫”为由对阿富汗的军事打击 ,未能遵循武装冲突中的人道主义法规则 ,其行动的合法性令人质疑。 After the terrorist attacks on the US on 11 September 2001, the US\|led military action in Afghanistan has had no basis in the positive international law. The US has justified its action in self\|defence, however, the military action has been inconsistent with the rules of humanitarian law in armed conflict. Therefore the legality of the action has been challenged.
作者 黄瑶
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2002年第5期561-566,共6页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 使用武力 恐怖主义 国际法 use of force terrorism international law
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1一月大事记(2001年9月)[N].参考消息,2001-10-03.
  • 2STAHN, Carsten. Security Council Resolutions 1368 (2001) and 1373 (2001): What They Say and What They Do Not Say[DB/OL]. http://www.ejil.org/forum-WTC/ny-stahn.html,2002-01-19.
  • 3WOLFRUM, Rudiger. United Nations: Law, Policies and Practice:2[M]. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995.
  • 4CASSESE, Antonio. Terrorism is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law[J].European Journal of International Law, 2001, 12(5).
  • 5GAJA, Giorgio. In What Sense was There an "Armed Attack" ?[DB/OL]. http://www.ejil.org/forum-WTC/ny-gaja.html, 2002-01-19.
  • 6"安理会支持美英行动阿拉伯举行反美示威"[N].参考消息, 北京:2001-10-10.
  • 7[英] M*阿库斯特.现代国际法概论[M].汪王宣,朱奇武,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981.
  • 8SINGH, J. N. Use of Force under International Law[M]. New Delhi: Harnam Publications, 1984,第78段.
  • 9Pierre-Marie Dupuy. The Law after the Destruction of the Towers[DB/OL]. http://www.ejil.org/forum-WTC/ny-dupuy.html, 2002-01-19.
  • 10安南呼吁停炸阿富汗美继续对阿使用集束炸弹[N]. 人民日报,2001-11-03.

共引文献1

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部