近年来学术界有关《钢铁是怎样炼成的》争论述评

Commentary on the controversies over The Making of Hero in the academic community in recent years

本文对于近年来有关《钢铁是怎样炼成的》是否经典的学术争论进行了梳理和述评。目前国内争论的主要趋向是:学界普遍认为该作品在反映生活方面缺乏真实性;保尔作为主要形象塑造得不太成功;"全译本"的提法有误,以及成书的过程缺乏完整性和独创性;形成"《钢铁》热"的原因与作品本身的价值无关。因而得出结论:《钢铁是怎样炼成的》只不过是一部具有一定文学性的读物,而远没有达到经典名著的程度。

The article sorts out the academic controversies,whether The Making of Hero is classic,and makes a commentary on them.It says by the trend of the discussion that it is commonly concepted in the academic community that the novel fails to represent the real life truthfully;the novel fails to portray the image of Panl successfully;the term whollytranslated version is a mistake and the novel was created without a complete process and without a style of its own;there is no connection between the value of the work and the rush for it.So we can come to a conclusion that the Making of Hero is in a certain sense literature reading material , but it is far from being a classic.