期刊文献+

综合痉挛量表的信度研究 被引量:100

Reliability of composite spasticity scale for brain injured patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :测试综合痉挛量表在国内使用的可行性及重复测试信度。方法 :测试 17例脑损伤患者 ,年龄 2 2— 75岁 (5 0 .1± 17.0岁 ) ;发病 2— 37周 (16 .9± 10 .8周 ) ;其中男 11例 ,女 6例 ;颅脑外伤 4例 ,脑卒中 13例 (脑梗塞 6例 ,脑出血 7例 )。由同一位医生在 1周内 2次评定患侧下肢的痉挛 ,内容包括跟腱反射、小腿三头肌的肌张力及踝阵挛。对量表的重复测试信度作等级间相关系数 (ICC)分析。结果 :本组脑损伤患者综合痉挛量表得分的单次测试最低为 8.9± 2 .8分 ,最高为 9.6± 3.2分 ,总体测试为 9.2± 0 .3分 ,属于轻度痉挛。同一天重复测试的ICC分别为 0 .96— 0 .99(第 1天 ) ,0 .95— 0 .99(第 2天 ) ,2次总体ICC为 0 .94— 0 .99。结论 :综合痉挛量表内容简单 ,评定标准清楚 ,重复测试信度良好 。 Objective: To test the intra-rater reliability of Composite Spasticity Scale (CSS) used on brain injured patients. Method: Spasticity of the ankle plantarflexors was evaluated with CSS in 17 patients. They were 11 males, 6 females, aged from 22 to 75 years (50.1±SD17.0). Among them, 13 were stroke (6 with cerebral infarction, 7 with hemorrhage) and 4 with traumatic brain injury, 2 to 37 weeks (16.9±10.8) post-injury. Spasticity was assessed twice at the same time on different days within one week by the same doctor. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed. Result:: CSS score in a single session ranged from 8.9±2.8 to 9.6±3.2 . The score from two sessions averaged 9.2±0.3, indicating that this group of patients manifested mild spasticity in the ankle plantarflexors. The ICC within the same session was 0.96-0.99 for the first session and 0.95-0.99 for the second session. The ICC from the two sessions averaged 0.94-0.99. Conclusion: CSS is a simple, sensitive and reliable scale for measurement of spasticity in the lower extremity of brain injuried patients.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2002年第5期263-265,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 香港理工大学重点学科基金(ASD No .A10 6) 香港理工大学博士基金 (No .G -V 64 0 )
关键词 综合痉挛量表 信度 研究 评价 脑损伤 spasticity scale reliability evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1A shworth B.Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis[J]. Practitioner,1964,192:540~542
  • 2Bohannon RW,Smith MB.Interrater reliability on amodified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity[J].Pher Ther,1987;67:206~207
  • 3Pandyan AD,Johnson GR,Price CIM,et al.Areview of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and mokified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity[J].Clin Rehab,1999,13:373~383
  • 4Rymer WZ,Katz R.Mechanical quantification of sapstic hypertonia[J]. Phy Med & Rehab,1994,8:455~463
  • 5Levin MF,Hui-Chan CWY.Are H and stretch reflexes in hemiparesis re producible and correlated with spasticity?[J]Journal of Neurology,1993, 240:63~71
  • 6Levin MF,Hui-Chan CWY.Ankle spasticity id inversely correlated with antagonist voluntary contraction in hemiparetic subjects[J].Electromyo_ graphy and Clinical Neurophysiology,1994,34:415~425
  • 7Goulet C,Arsenault AB,Bourbonnais D,MT,Lepage Y.Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on Hreflex and spinal spasticity[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.1996,28:169~176
  • 8Nadeau S,Arsenault AB,Grave lD,Lepage Y,Gourbonnais D.Analysis of the spasticity index used in adults with a stroke[J].Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation,1998,11:219~220
  • 9Nadeau S,Grave lD,Arsenault AB,Gourbonnais D.Analysis of the clinical factors determinaing natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with as troke [J].American Journal of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation,1999,78: 123~130

共引文献194

同被引文献1306

引证文献100

二级引证文献1007

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部