摘要
在20世纪20年代中后期联共(布)党内关于如何建设社会主义问题的争论中,出现过托洛茨基方案、布哈林方案和斯大林方案。斯大林方案实施的结果就是后来人们所熟悉的斯大林模式的建立。本文从社会文化心理的角度着重分析了托洛茨基方案与布哈林方案分别被淘汰出局的原因,探讨了二者落败的自身逻辑。作者认为,托洛茨基方案是苏联社会由革命转向建设过程中革命惯性的产物,而布哈林方案则是革命转向建设过程中建设性思维的前驱。文章还对斯大林方案的历史合理性进行了新的解读。
In mid and late 1920s, while the question how to build socialism was debated within the Soviet Communist Par-ty(Bolshevik) , there were a Trotsky' s scheme, a Bukharin' s scheme and a Stalin's scheme. Implementation of Stalin ' s scheme resulted in the establishment of the later well-known Stalin model. The Trotsky Scheme was the product of the revolutionary inertia in the process of the Soviet society shifting from the track of revolution to construction. And the Bukharin scheme was the ideological pioneer in the transition from revolution to construction.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
2002年第5期85-89,共5页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences