“效用价值论”批判——从“效用价值”的逻辑出发

Critique of "Utility Theory of Value"——Based on the Logic of "Utility Value"

在"边际效用"论占据强势话语的当下,澄清其在价值理论上的误区,对坚持和发展马克思劳动价值论具有重大的理论意义。对"稀缺""效用""边际效用""自然力"以及"生产要素"等"效用价值"论的逻辑中介范畴分析表明:价值的高低不在于"稀缺",而在于"劳动耗费"。因此"价值悖论"是一个伪问题,"无差异曲线"只能解释价值的表象,"稀缺"的改变以及"边际效用"趋于递减,是人类劳动的必然结果。"要素价值论"虽然有精确的"数学量化"做依据,但用数学精确量化以后的现象仍然是现象,并未能揭示出事物的本质。

At the moment when the'marginal utility'theory occupies strong discourse,clarifying its misunderstanding in value theory has great theoretical significance for adhering to and developing Marx’s labor theory of value.As shown by the analysis of the category of logical intermediaries of'utility theory of value',such as scarcity,utility,marginal utility,natural force and production factors,value depends on'labor consumption',rather than'scarcity'.Therefore,'value paradox'is a pseudo-problem,and'indifference curve'can only explain the representation of value.Changes in'scarcity'and the fact that'marginal utility'tends to decrease are inevitable results of human labor.Although the'factor value theory'has accurate'mathematical quantification'as its basis,the phenomenon after accurate mathematical quantification is still only a phenomenon,and it fails to reveal the essence of things.