亚瑟的“新辩证法”与社会主义市场经济的可能性

Arthur’s "New Dialectic" and the Possibility of Socialist Market Economy

亚瑟在《新辩证法与马克思的<资本论>》中特别强调价值形式的意义。他由此出发讨论了梅扎罗斯对苏联的“计划经济”所做的批评,认为梅扎罗斯把苏联的“计划经济”视为变相的资本统治是错误的;苏联的所谓“计划经济”并不是真正的社会主义,但它也不是资本统治,而是一种官僚统治下的命令经济。亚瑟认为苏联体制只适用于革命动员时期,不适用于和平时期的社会主义建设。然而,由于亚瑟否定了非资本主义市场经济存在的可能性,他只能把苏联体制视为“在社会主义内部对社会主义的否定”,看不到在价值增殖之外的使用价值生产的积极意义,更不可能理解“社会主义市场经济”这种与资本主义生产力处于同一水平上的经济体制,以及在此基础上建立社会主义生态文明的可能性。

In The New Dialectic and Marx’s Capital, Arthur emphasizes the significance of value form. He thus sets out to discuss Meszaros ’ criticism of the "planned economy " of the USSR,arguing that Meszaros is wrong to treat " planned economy " of the USSR as disguised capital regime, since the so-called " planned economy " of The USSR is neither socialist nor capitalist, but no more than command economy under bureaucratic regime.Arthur believes that, even though command economy can do in the period of revolutionary mobilization, it is sure to fail in the socialist construction during peace time.However, as he rejects the possibility of non-capitalist market economy, Arthur can only concludes with contempt that the Soviet system is" negation of socialism in socialism" and hence unable to highlight the positive significance of the production of use value beyond the process of valorization, let alone to understand the system of "socialist market economy" at the same level of productivity with capitalism, nor the possibility of socialist ecological civilization on this foundation.