摘要
奥地利马克思主义的政治理论在第二国际中属于中派,在俄国十月革命胜利后,特别是第一次世界大战爆发后,他们的政治理想发生了分裂。然而,虽然对暴力革命、无产阶级专政、议会民主等概念的阐释发生了分歧,但奥地利马克思主义的精神实质还是不变的,他们提出了诸如'防御性暴力'论等改良主义论断,即对现实政治的共同特征是妥协的趋向,或者说是一种中间道路的观点。以列宁为代表的马克思主义经典作家科学总结了俄国十月革命的经验,对奥地利马克思主义折中主义的革命观进行了批驳,构建了完备的暴力革命框架,为之后的无产阶级革命指明了正确的通路。
Austro-Marxist political theory belonged to the middle group in the Second International, after the victory of the October Revolution,particularly after the outbreak of World War I, there was a split between their political views. However, while the interpretation of violent revolution, the dictatorship of the proletariat, parliamentary democracy was different, but the spiritual essence of Austro-Marxism was still the same.They put forward such as the reformism theory of ' defensive violence ',namely political compromises, or a middle road. The classic Marxist writers represented by Lenin scientifically summarized the experiences of the October Revolution.Lenin criticized the eclectic view of revolution by AustroMarxism,he built a complete framework of violent revolution, and pointed out the correct way of proletarian revolution for the future.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
CSSCI
2018年第1期287-299,437,共14页
Contemporary Marxism Review
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“奥地利马克思主义研究”(15CKS027)
中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目(2016M591751)阶段性研究成果
关键词
十月革命
奥地利马克思主义
折中主义
议会政治
暴力革命
October Revolution
Austro-Marxism
eclecticism
parliamentary democracy
violent revolution