期刊文献+

改革开放四十年经济法和经济法学的互动发展 被引量:6

Review and Outlook of Economic Law of China since the Reform and Opening-up
下载PDF
导出
摘要 改革开放四十年,经过初创、发展和完善等阶段,经济法最终成为具有中国特色社会主义法律体系中一个组成部分,我国也由此成为世界上第一个由最高立法机关公开确认经济法的国家。与此同时,中国经济法学作为社会主义法学体系的一个分支学科也随之形成。中国经济法学是我国经济、政治、社会、法律和法学等特殊环境的产物,它以市场和政府关系法治化为主线,具有明显的时代特性和民族个性。学者应当结合新时代中国的市场经济和社会现实,运用新时代中国特色社会主义思想,充分学习和吸收各国先进的法学理论,通过不断的理论创新,实现中国经济法学的勃兴。 In the 40 years of the reform and Opening-up,economic law of China has experienced the stages of initial creation,development and improvement,becoming an integral part of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics.China has therefore been the first country that the highest legislature publicly recognizes the economic law.At the same time,the science of economic law has also formed as a branch of the socialist jurisprudence,and regarded as a product in specific environments of China’s economic,political,social,law,jurisprudence,etc.and following the rule of law on the relationship between the market and the government,thereby obviously showing contemporary features and national traits.With the rapid development of China’s economy and the rise of the Chinese nation,the science of economic law of China will eventually become an iconic discipline with the characteristics of the East and West after that of German and Japanese.Scholars ought to combine the thought on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a New Era with the market economy and social reality of China,and fully learn and absorb the advanced legal theories of other countries to conduct continuous theoretical innovation for the sake of the prosperity of the economic law.
作者 薛克鹏 Xue Kepeng
出处 《地方立法研究》 2018年第6期41-61,共21页 Local Legislation Journal
关键词 改革开放 中国经济法 中国市场经济 中国经济法学 回顾和展望 the reform and opening-up economic law of China market economy of China the science of economic law of China review and prospect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1王克稳.行政法学视野中的“经济法”——经济行政法之论[J].中国法学,1999(4):65-73. 被引量:37
  • 2李克歆.质疑“经济行政法”的回归[J].社会科学家,2006,21(6):96-98. 被引量:3
  • 3刘志刚.论服务行政条件下的行政私法行为[J].行政法学研究,2007(1):61-67. 被引量:16
  • 4Underhill Moore and Charles C. Callahan. Law and Learning Theory: A Study in Legal Control[A]. 53Yale L. Rev.1 (1943). William W. Fisher Ⅲ, et al. (edited)American Legal Realism [ C ]. Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 5Anita Weinberg, Carol Harding. Interdisciplinary Teaching and Collaboration in Higher Education: A Concept Whose Time Has Come [ J]. 14Washington University Journal of Law and Policy15,2004.
  • 6波斯纳著 孙秋宁译.反托拉斯法(第2版·序)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003..
  • 7贝克尔著 王献生 王宁译.家庭论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998..
  • 8庞德著 沈宗灵译.通过法律的社会控制[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 9这两个概念的区分来自美国现实主义法律学者Thurman W.Arnold的一篇文章,Institute Priests and Yale Observers-aReply to Dean Goodrich,94 Uni.Pa.L.Rev.811(1936),载William W.Fisher Ⅲ,et al.(edited)American Legal Realism,Oxford University Press,1993,pp283-289.
  • 10.[Z].,..

共引文献93

同被引文献32

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部