1H Tillman.Evaluating quality on the net.http://www.tiac.net/users/hope/finkqual.html.
2Alison Cook,Alison McNab,Betsy Anagnostelis.The good,the bad and the ugly:internet review sites.http://biome.ac.uk/sage/inlim96.html
3T Matthew Ciolek.Today's WWW,tomorrow's MMM:the specter of multi-roedia mediocrity.Educom Review,1997,32(3):http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewArticles/32323,html.
4David Stoker and Alison Cooke.Evaluation of networked information sources.http://biome.ac.uk/sage/esscn.html.
5Culver JDC,Gerr F.Frumkin H.Medical information on the Internet:a study of an electronic bulletin board.J Gen Intern med.1997,12(8):466-470.
6Ambre J,Guard R,Perveilev FM,Renner J.Rippen H.White paper,criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet.http://www.mitreted.org/hiti/showease/documents/criteria.html.
7Quality selection criteria for subject gateways.http://sosig.ac.uk/desire/qintro.html
9Joan Ormondroyd,Michael Engle,Tony Cosgrave.How to critically analyze information sources.http://urisref.library.comell.edu/skill26.htm.
10Linda C Smith.Selection and Evaluation of Reference Souroes.See:Richard E Bopp,Linda C Smith.Reference and Information Services:An Introduction.Englewood,CO:Libraries Unlimited,1991:240.
