不同验光方法在青少年近视眼防治中的临床意义

Cinical significance of various optometries in prevention and cure of juvenile myopes

目的比较两种验光方法测得结果的差异,探讨其对近视眼发展的影响。方法本组门诊验光青少年2000例,用直接插片和散瞳检影法进行对比验光。结果插片验光对散光的总检出率为30.05%,散瞳验光对散光的总检出率为82.75%,二者差异有显著性,P<0.01。插片验光双眼检出屈光度一致性为87.45%;,散瞳验光双眼检出屈光度一致性为18%,二者差异也有显著性。结论不同验光方法配戴矫正眼镜后,在缓解或消除眼球疲劳、控制近视发展上,存在着差异显著性。

Purpose To compare the differences of results detected by two optometries, and to study their advantage on the cure of myopia. Methods Take either trial lens and skiascopy to diagnose 2000 cases of juvenile myopes by two groups. Results Astigmatism check-up rate by trial lenses is 30.05%, and 82.72% by skiascoy, results between two groups are remarkable (P<0.01).Diopter accordance by trial lenses is 87.45%, and 18.0% by cyclopegic skiascopy, results between two groups are still remarkable. Conclusion There exist remarkable differences between trial lenses and cyclopegic skiascopy in mitigating and eliminating asthenopia and in control of myopia.