期刊文献+

国内外社会空间分异测度研究综述 被引量:17

A review of social spatial segregation measurements
原文传递
导出
摘要 社会空间分异作为一个具有社会性及空间性的概念,其测度研究直接关系到隔离等级划分的合理性和有效性。本文根据不同历史时期空间分异测度研究所关注的视角,将社会空间分异测度研究分为早期萌芽阶段、多维度群体评估阶段、空间转向阶段、多模型多视角阶段等4个阶段,介绍了社会空间分异测度指标在各阶段的演变特点和主要测度指标,并对其中26个主要指数进行比较和分类,阐述各指数的适用范围和优缺点。分析国内社会空间分异相关研究现状,指出其存在多维度指标使用较少且多为实证性研究,空间分异测算方法缺少理论基础的不足。移动互联网和社交网络空间快速发展,对社会空间分异的测算方法提出新的要求;基于地理位置信息的个人行为空间交互数据和基于虚拟网络的赛博空间交互数据,为社会空间分异研究提供了新的研究视角。 Social spatial segregation is a concept of sociality and spatiality. Its measurement directly impacts the validity of the classification of segregation degrees. According to the different focuses of spatial segregation research through its development, the author divides social spatial segregation study into the following stages: the beginning from the 1950 s to the 1970s; the multi-dimensional group assessment stage in the 1980s; switching to a spatial focus in the 1990s; multi-modeling and multi-perspective period in the 2000 s to date. This review introduces the main features of different approaches, the social background against which the developments occurred,and the main measurement indices and models of each stage. Socio-spatial segregation research started relatively late in China. It can be divided into an early embryonic stage from the 1980 s to the 1990 s and the vigorous development stage from 2000 to present. Socio-spatial segregation research in China involved mostly empirical studies with aspatial measures of segregation, which cannot solve the modifiable areal unit problem beyond the census tract and thus made little theoretical contribution to the ongoing debates. Segregation research often used more traditional segregation indices, lacking multi-dimensional spatial-correction segregation methods. The papers reviewed were not based on previous research and cross- fertilization did not seem to occur. As a result, a unified paradigm has not appeared. The rapid development of mobile Internet and social network space in the past few years put forward new demands to the social spatial segregation calculation method. On the other hand,location- based personal behavioral data and virtual network- based cyberspace interactive data provide a new perspective for socio-spatial segregation study.
出处 《地理科学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期818-829,共12页 Progress in Geography
基金 教育部人文社科项目(09YJC840016) 国家自然科学基金项目(41001088)
关键词 社会空间分异 测度算法 分异指标 综述 social spatial segregation measurement segregation index review
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1杨永亮.长三角地区生产性服务业空间分异及其影响因素研究[D].浙江财经学院2013
  • 2樊福才.黄河流域城市经济空间分异与发展研究[D].河南大学2008
  • 3(美) 马克卢普,著.美国的知识生产与分配[M]. 中国人民大学出版社, 2007
  • 4Qiyan Wu,Jianquan Cheng,Guo Chen,Denial J. Hammel,Xiaohui Wu.Socio-spatial differentiation and residential segregation in the Chinese city based on the 2000 community-level census data: A case study of the inner city of Nanjing[J]. Cities . 2014
  • 5Antwan Jones.Segregation and cardiovascular illness: The role of individual and metropolitan socioeconomic status[J]. Health and Place . 2013
  • 6Jonathan T.Rothwell,Douglas S.Massey.Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas[J]. Social Science Quarterly . 2010 (5)
  • 7ZhigangLi,FulongWu.Tenure‐based residential segregation in post‐reform Chinese cities: a case study of Shanghai[J].Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.2008(3)
  • 8Sean F. Reardon,Chad R. Farrell,Stephen A. Matthews,David O’Sullivan,Kendra Bischoff,Glenn Firebaugh.Race and space in the 1990s: Changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990–2000[J]. Social Science Research . 2008 (1)
  • 9DavidO’Sullivan,David W. S.Wong.A Surface‐Based Approach to Measuring Spatial Segregation[J]. Geographical Analysis . 2007 (2)
  • 10F. F. Feitosa,G. Camara,A. M. V. Monteiro,T. Koschitzki,M. P. S. Silva.Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science . 2007 (3)

共引文献3

同被引文献273

引证文献17

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部