摘要
本文从传统的法律选择方法出发,讨论跨国民商事案件中法律选择方法论多元主义的合理性,以及形成的历史和制度基础。首先,在国际私法方法论发展历程中,存在若干相应的对称性。其中包括:单边主义和多边主义、以规则为中心的方法(法则理论)和以法律关系为中心的方法、管辖权选择的方法和规则选择的方法、概念论的方法和目的论的方法、主观论的方法和客观论的方法、冲突法的方法和实体法的方法等。其次,利益主体的多元化,对国际私法方法论多元主义的形成起到了至关重要的作用。再次,此类方法论上多元主义并不是新近形成的现象,而只是其在当代国际私法发展中念发显示出了其在理论和实践中的重要性。
This paper examines the rationality of the pluralism of methodology of private international law from the standpoint of traditional choice-of-law method,along with its historical and instrumental basis.First,during the development of private in- ternational law,there exist several symmetries,such as unilaterlism and multilateral- ism,jurisdiction-selection and rule-selection approach,conceptualism and teleology, conflict-of-law approach and substantive-law approach,etc.Second,the pluralisision of social interest have being played a great important role in the formation of the pluralism of private international law methodology.Third,while the pluralism of methods is not new phenomenon,it has assumed renewed importance in our day.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2003年第1期118-166,共49页
Wuhan University International Law Review